From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Chamberlain Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] sysctl: Add a size argument to register functions in sysctl Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 20:00:45 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20230731071728.3493794-1-j.granados@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 8178660E35 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 618C760E02 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org B782860E35 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 06BC660E02 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=awhihqdhuWHeoYd3N+GeqIh75MDzai4L3hYXPN/a5fs=; b=tUST17gLJ8xZ0XM9L8/HrXEzU6 tZMGClzY4pZ/RImt/bnbB/JZcOjtt5PmKLr+dRTMvmYeQEcUBooY2DNhz58NUerVaQqDC015TRyjc g1IssTuWVGi/DL9wssEj8dLTlcAJscsVmNWS5BVgJhme/xZGO0m8ySRFoRMNYJTG4Xl7MxTjTGp7C ZalLCKJuEZWuvODxF3D9hPb9kAHImXekJu/C7Hsr+LVqEdAUuRP99EiAC4ltf/mLdEYZHlbcagzl2 JAzO8s3ORZZCLfmIi6xHnozbVOvMIBfDJ4vQwyENOCQFObn49Nzg3oOA/pzlUucU/MFJhjPm93T0s D1w47+5g==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bridge-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Bridge" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Chris Maness Cc: Joel Granados , Alexander Aring , Catalin Marinas , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Miquel Raynal , Paolo Abeni , Jan Karcher , Mat Martineau , Tony Lu , Alexander Gordeev , Stefan Schmidt , Steffen Klassert , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, Xin Long , Herbert Xu , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, Jozsef Kadlecsik On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 07:50:44PM -0700, Chris Maness wrote: > I tried running the current mainline kernel (current Arch Linux) with > simple single MUX socket (ax0) using LinFBB. I was a happy camper as > it seemed to work fine at first, then the system just slowed to a > crawl. I am wondering if any of these patches are addressing this > behavior. If its a regressio no. > No kernel panic like before, but not what I was hoping for. > I have also tried sixpack, and that explodes instantly the last time I > have checked. That goes all the way back to the v4 kernels. Are you reporting a separate regression that goes all the way back to v4 kernels? > v2 is fine there. What does this mean? Luis