From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60CC147A74 for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 11:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716292090; cv=none; b=m5KA+bIV1wTWZP4VIwLfNQNG5KELgzmJ7MlAs5QsF4VvU8mbomgYoA8RWUe7BJaswXj0AcAVDn/nPZ4rMgZV5H991vceMh9caYo96Dg1TTEeEfxIrzukXbD7Oyjy3WtlLQjvRuHvdJdnLw7sjuEHpBv+BSXmXHeLtP2FXTsobCM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716292090; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sRvHQdaoL4HzqnyTUGKlHAmifCh6RB/oD814KwauDz0=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=ins6NzBuAMiioGzS4ayDlWpgyW6G+I+by+xLshFdK0YCscHFHd4KvvzYDoSXjsZEWrWHOfJcFVj3lek/MY11l+dUlB6qicOr6w35lRc7xDO/6ls6tXfPey+u6sgUzG0QNtjV++sA4B2wEy6RFP6zVjEMsoiB2WPC7JGnZ+FpJpk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=CIr3f940; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="CIr3f940" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type :Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:MIME-Version: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=DXHxI8vLFnLaqEXIYfNqZ0jYy6m1J0CanBK8ZWH3AH0=; b=CIr3f940Rb4F1YqxYaw9Whlq3c 6/k/grFhKPQmMDvjPW3T1c6lTYRWuEOg3xvMvrVzzJ8MgKOXunjykyGABDNWRt+bQHW9tpEPN/FB7 Ge16YDBvYgUvQHKbkuenewSkTclJwzhsPJBY4w9x/4OA0ex8iobUVM8otC1GAABsLS0u5bQLjjrTi wWndMQ286SgSfTMtH+qjsV7LjYp588CXj/PC070GBJcPmOoDuixK0Ylfv4hH+wt7egcMpMNYTC0ha /LpJKJ+HhymwPsYWmhEzNXffFqMoQ6QQAckcMGL7zczjS4QgRNP3ShkLh3mnZz7wYv7SXAUMNqVLM XGCbwkfQ==; Received: from authenticated user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s9NyH-00CxNe-SY; Tue, 21 May 2024 11:47:58 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1DD1200066; Tue, 21 May 2024 07:47:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap53 ([10.202.2.103]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 May 2024 07:47:53 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdeivddggeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtgfesthhqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdff rghvvgcujfhisggsvghrugdfuceohhhisggshiesuggvsghirghnrdhorhhgqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffhfehiedtveeiveekffdvueejgfevgeeijedufeekheevteefueek ieeutedvgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpeguodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqddugeehtdduhedvjedv qdduieeffeelfeekhedqhhhisggshieppeguvggsihgrnhdrohhrghesvhgvhhhisggsvg hrugdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if431490a:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 85413364006F; Tue, 21 May 2024 07:47:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-480-g515a2f54a-fm-20240515.001-g515a2f54 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20240501060218.32898-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn> <4it3k7z5sylbv4agiztmwdhaudo2orccpm5pbi24bsu6fyajfm@k3zulkrpqaof> Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 12:47:30 +0100 From: "Dave Hibberd" To: "Chris Maness" , "Dan Cross" Cc: "Lars Kellogg-Stedman" , "Duoming Zhou" , linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org Subject: Re: Kernel 6.9.1 AX.25 Crash Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Debian-User: hibby Can you use other libax25 dependent packages or is it only Uronode? axcall for netrom would be a reasonable starter to see if it's a libax25= problem or not.=20 LinFBB, from what I remember, uses its own internal state machine/etc on= ce it's bound to the socket. Cheers, --=20 Hibby Debian Developer Packet Radioist MM0RFN On Tue, 21 May 2024, at 4:07 AM, Chris Maness wrote: > Ok, the only thing not working so far is UROnode in this system. I am > thinking it needs to be updated to the newer kernel. I am getting: > > ERROR; connect_to: bind: Cannot assign requested address > > When I try to connect to a NETROM node from UROnode (AX.25 only works = tho). > > I can connect from LinFBB with NETROM directly to other nodes using my > NETROM port in LinFBB. > > -Chris KQ6UP > > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 7:12=E2=80=AFPM Dan Cross w= rote: >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 9:06=E2=80=AFPM Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: >> > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 05:11:39PM GMT, Chris Maness wrote: >> > > Your patch seems to have fixed the issue so far. >> > >> > That's great! I'm glad it helped. >> > >> > > How come this patch is not included in the mainline source? >> > >> > Well, partly because you're the first person to confirm that it wor= ks >> > for someone besides me :). Dan (Cross) has offered to test it out as >> > well; if I can get a couple of confirmations that it's working, I'll >> > probably go ahead and submit it to netdev. >> >> I am running this as of today, and so far so good. >> >> > The bigger issue has been that there are very few people interested= in >> > the ax.25 support in the kernel; there's not a real maintainer, so = it's >> > difficult to get code approved. There were some concerns expressed = that >> > maybe this isn't the *correct* fix, but I would argue that even if = it's >> > not the most correct fix we should try to get it in anyway, since >> > otherwise ax.25 is completely broken. >> >> Agreed: what's there now is objectively broken. Please, let's not let >> the perfect be the enemy of the good here. >> >> - Dan C. > > > > --=20 > Thanks, > Chris Maness