Linux Hardening
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	 platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:14:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174980967013.26331.3871583437927541253.b4-ty@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529181831.work.439-kees@kernel.org>

On Thu, 29 May 2025 11:18:37 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

> When KCOV is enabled all functions get instrumented, unless the
> __no_sanitize_coverage attribute is used. To prepare for
> __no_sanitize_coverage being applied to __init functions[1], we have
> to handle differences in how GCC's inline optimizations get resolved.
> For thinkpad_acpi routines, this means forcing two functions to be
> inline with __always_inline.
> 
> [...]


Thank you for your contribution, it has been applied to my local
review-ilpo-next branch. Note it will show up in the public
platform-drivers-x86/review-ilpo-next branch only once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

The list of commits applied:
[1/1] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches
      commit: 6418a8504187dc7f5b6f9d0649c03e362cb0664b

--
 i.


      reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-29 18:18 [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Handle KCOV __init vs inline mismatches Kees Cook
2025-06-13 10:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174980967013.26331.3871583437927541253.b4-ty@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox