From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] find: Do not read beyond variable boundaries on small sizes
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:19:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202112081104.958EC2E6@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211207233930.GA3955@lapt>
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 03:39:30PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> Bitmap functions work identically for all sizes from 0 to INT_MAX - 1.
> Users don't 'choose between functions based on the size of their target'.
> [...]
> for_each_*_bit() requires a pointer to an array of unsigned longs. If
> it's provided with something else, this is an error on a caller side.
I have a sense we're both talking past each other. Let me try to show
what I'm seeing: the code in the bitmap API chooses one of two paths:
- if "size" is a constant expression and is sizeof(unsigned long) or
smaller, mask to "size" and call into ff*() built-ins.
- else, use a dynamic sized loop against a series of unsigned longs.
For the dynamic size case, yes, absolutely, things must stay unsigned
long aligned, etc, that makes sense. I don't want to change anything
there.
For the constant-expression size, this requirement does not hold. Every
helper performs a constant expression sized mask of the argument before
using ff*(), for example:
unsigned long val;
if (unlikely(offset >= size))
return size;
val = *addr & GENMASK(size - 1, offset);
return val ? __ffs(val) : size;
In this case, the argument does _not_ need to be a pointer to native
unsigned long. And this is seen in the many many places in the kernel
using non-unsigned-long arguments with a constant-expression size. (e.g.
an int with size 32).
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-03 10:08 [PATCH] find: Do not read beyond variable boundaries on small sizes Kees Cook
2021-12-03 12:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-03 16:37 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-03 19:16 ` Yury Norov
2021-12-03 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-03 18:26 ` Yury Norov
2021-12-03 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-12-03 23:01 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-07 23:39 ` Yury Norov
2021-12-08 5:25 ` Yury Norov
2021-12-08 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-08 13:07 ` David Laight
2021-12-08 19:19 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-12-08 19:34 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-08 23:23 ` Rasmus Villemoes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202112081104.958EC2E6@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).