From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NFS: Avoid memcpy() run-time warning for struct sockaddr overflows
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:32:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202210261631.DE7E4761E@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017043107.never.457-kees@kernel.org>
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 09:36:50PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The 'nfs_server' and 'mount_server' structures include a union of
> 'struct sockaddr' (with the older 16 bytes max address size) and
> 'struct sockaddr_storage' which is large enough to hold all the
> supported sa_family types (128 bytes max size). The runtime memcpy()
> buffer overflow checker is seeing attempts to write beyond the 16
> bytes as an overflow, but the actual expected size is that of 'struct
> sockaddr_storage'. Plumb the use of 'struct sockaddr_storage' more
> completely through-out NFS, which results in adjusting the memcpy()
> buffers to the correct union members. Avoids this false positive run-time
> warning under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
>
> memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 28) of single field "&ctx->nfs_server.address" at fs/nfs/namespace.c:178 (size 16)
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202210110948.26b43120-yujie.liu@intel.com
> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Friendly ping -- this needs to land in v6.1 to avoid these warnings.
Should I carry this in the hardening tree instead?
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-26 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 4:36 [PATCH v2] NFS: Avoid memcpy() run-time warning for struct sockaddr overflows Kees Cook
2022-10-26 23:32 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-10-27 0:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2022-10-27 0:26 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-02 15:51 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202210261631.DE7E4761E@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox