[PATCH 7/9] drm: tests: Fix invalid printf format specifiers in KUnit tests

David Gow
2024-02-21T09:28:33Z

The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
multiplication division helpers.

However, the variable is logged by some KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() using the
'%d' or '%llu' format specifiers, the former of which is always wrong,
and the latter is no longer correct now that ps is no longer a u64. Fix
these to all use '%lu'.

Also, drm_mm_test calls KUNIT_FAIL() with an empty string as the
message. gcc warns if a printf format string is empty (apparently), so
give these some more detailed error messages, which should be more
useful anyway.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Fixes: fca7526b7d89 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix build failure on 32-bit targets")
Fixes: fc8d29e298cf ("drm: selftest: convert drm_mm selftest to KUnit")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 14 +++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
index 8a464f7f4c61..3dbfa3078449 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -55,30 +55,30 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
ps, ps, list, 0),
- "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+ "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n",
ps);
} while (++i < n_pages);

KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
- "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+ "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);

drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
- "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+ "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
- "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+ "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 2 * ps);

drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
- "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+ "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);
/*
* At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 blocks,
* however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and right) so
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
- "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+ "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", 2 * ps);

drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
- "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+ "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);

total = 0;
list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
index 1eb0c304f960..f37c0d765865 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void drm_test_mm_init(struct kunit *test)

/* After creation, it should all be one massive hole */
if (!assert_one_hole(test, &mm, 0, size)) {
- KUNIT_FAIL(test, "");
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, "mm not one hole on creation");
goto out;
}

@@ -171,14 +171,14 @@ static void drm_test_mm_init(struct kunit *test)

/* After filling the range entirely, there should be no holes */
if (!assert_no_holes(test, &mm)) {
- KUNIT_FAIL(test, "");
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, "mm has holes when filled");
goto out;
}

/* And then after emptying it again, the massive hole should be back */
drm_mm_remove_node(&tmp);
if (!assert_one_hole(test, &mm, 0, size)) {
- KUNIT_FAIL(test, "");
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, "mm does not have single hole after emptying");
goto out;
}

--
2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog