From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8150F2D374F; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772003757; cv=none; b=vFpxnbGIOXGobHJ8nGs+U7HBA5vNI0QUuOw/bukugn5ui5aTa3pUbqEZf6yRD13nJ6LwiCUCsgpLc3KvANYg4C5vGuzvnRD+fwAhU7cOfMryuVtlfJt+YS49vj197kPo08s9H+6omAgL+QBjKGndBxSOMQh4n4U4cHiiTEpXJJI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772003757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4BdT8DUi7UC7RFjd1x4PTnvnw1YSgTjXNR2GltKSXTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FWtBDPTB6OgMzf+gZIsMSX4cfoz87kscnBInw9WdkO3LVbzPpEQyEzuXAth/pzFnhw0VrVdJJiBWzJGPbjTHqAYBAu1KDf0yB3IUJMJ+hb55Oj2R6ovPBG8Ywbm8NTjo1LwXn9W4iFf/JKWfKP4J28hdayzCfBTBSeeJXyIOXng= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TPsNsUYr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TPsNsUYr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08F77C116D0; Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:15:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772003757; bh=4BdT8DUi7UC7RFjd1x4PTnvnw1YSgTjXNR2GltKSXTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TPsNsUYrj+Fqdw9dRfQKzsT3tMy3u1TDm4AoZVBqag6LtBFdGVjQyJkZDYJvSIZv3 UjSI7y+1GvByJHwvgqLudsQOdYwaRmrynMtukU13oBcSaciaWPKin04/z2QqQtTdiA 6FDGYyxWb3782DVe463sw1ddADZdDarAmN8KVGLvBip6S33WPCtbuxqqDACYBKIJIs 3+mqFvc/t4xLOXV5LMmmafzBzxdSZVHm/4/GKJ6TDUaEyN77k+mNDhpG0JOv1oVmK3 F+3HyOYmbPQsqvDC//7ryRqieJd4h18nPei3J6gQJT3INmw77pNNy56DJ/z2R2PmPo vwIJtt4WMK3Kw== Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 23:15:56 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Roman Gushchin , Harry Yoo , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Saturate to SIZE_MAX for allocation size overflows Message-ID: <202602242315.C9D5430C7@keescook> References: <20260225013954.work.319-kees@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 03:59:08AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:40:02PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h > > @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *kmalloc_array_noprof(size_t n, size_t siz > > size_t bytes; > > > > if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(n, size, &bytes))) > > - return NULL; > > + bytes = SIZE_MAX; > > return kmalloc_noprof(bytes, flags); > > Wouldn't this be better written as: > > return kmalloc_noprof(size_mul(n, size), flags); > > (etc) Sure, I can convert them all that way if that's preferred? -- Kees Cook