public inbox for linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 2/3] fortify: Optimise strnlen()
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 15:22:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260416152235.44470829@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202603311650.A59396A@keescook>

On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:51:26 -0700
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 11:09:14PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > Any uses should be replaced by __builtin_strlen().  
> 
> When I looked at this before, __builtin_strlen() flip to run-time strlen
> on non-constant strings, which is why I had to jump through all the
> hoops to avoid calling it in those cases.
> 

I've (finally) looked at this. - and found some extra strlen() calls.
The bloat-o-meter also showed a few places that shrank - not looked at them.

I'll look again, probably doing:
	if (__builtin_constant(str[0]) {
		len = __builting_strlen(str);
		if (__builtin_constant(len)) {
			/* got a constant string */
			...
			return ...;
		}
	}
	/* non-constant */
	...

It only matters for a couple of functions where you don't want the
actual length, trying to factor it out is probably too fragile.

	David


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-16 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-30 13:20 [PATCH next 0/3] fortify: Minor changes to strlen() and strnlen() david.laight.linux
2026-03-30 13:20 ` [PATCH next 1/3] fortify: replace __compiletime_lessthan() with statically_true() david.laight.linux
2026-03-30 23:50   ` Kees Cook
2026-03-30 13:20 ` [PATCH next 2/3] fortify: Optimise strnlen() david.laight.linux
2026-03-30 23:54   ` Kees Cook
2026-03-31 22:09     ` David Laight
2026-03-31 23:51       ` Kees Cook
2026-04-01 13:48         ` David Laight
2026-04-03  8:50         ` David Laight
2026-04-16 14:22         ` David Laight [this message]
2026-03-31  6:36   ` Kees Cook
2026-03-31 10:14     ` David Laight
2026-03-31 14:55       ` David Laight
2026-03-31 15:56         ` Kees Cook
2026-04-01  0:15   ` kernel test robot
2026-04-03  8:23     ` David Laight
2026-03-30 13:20 ` [PATCH next 3/3] fortify: Simplify strlen() logic david.laight.linux
2026-03-31  6:07   ` Kees Cook
2026-03-31  8:58     ` David Laight
2026-03-31  6:18   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260416152235.44470829@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox