From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Joe Breuer <linux-kernel@jmbreuer.net>,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Linux Power Management <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Hardening <linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux SCSI <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Waking up from resume locks up on sr device
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:04:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f85cb4a-8b14-623f-eb4e-40baab1ed888@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <859f0eda-4984-4489-9851-c9f6ec454a88@rowland.harvard.edu>
On 6/14/23 07:26, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 04:35:50PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> Or... Why the heck scsi_rescan_device() is calling device_lock() ? This
>> is the only place in scsi code I can see that takes this lock. I suspect
>> this is to serialize either rescans, or serialize with resume, or both.
>> For serializing rescans, we can use another lock. For serializing with
>> PM, we should wait for PM transitions...
>> Something is not right here.
>
> Here's what commit e27829dc92e5 ("scsi: serialize ->rescan against
> ->remove", written by Christoph Hellwig) says:
>
> Lock the device embedded in the scsi_device to protect against
> concurrent calls to ->remove.
>
> That's the commit which added the device_lock() call.
Even if scsi_rescan_device() would use another mechanism for
serialization against sd_remove() and sr_remove(), we still need to
solve the issue that the ATA code calls scsi_rescan_device() before
resuming has finished. scsi_rescan_device() issues I/O. Issuing I/O to a
device is not allowed before that device has been resumed.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-14 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 11:04 Fwd: Waking up from resume locks up on sr device Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-10 6:38 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-10 8:55 ` Pavel Machek
2023-06-10 13:27 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-10 15:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-06-11 9:05 ` Joe Breuer
2023-06-11 11:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-14 4:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-14 5:37 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-06-14 6:31 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-14 7:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-14 6:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-06-14 7:35 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-14 14:26 ` Alan Stern
2023-06-14 14:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-06-14 18:04 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2023-06-14 22:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-15 0:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-15 4:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-15 4:57 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-15 5:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-12 3:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-12 6:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-06-12 7:22 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-12 7:36 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-06-12 7:47 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-06-12 14:33 ` Alan Stern
2023-06-12 15:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f85cb4a-8b14-623f-eb4e-40baab1ed888@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@jmbreuer.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox