From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83794227BB5; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772100167; cv=none; b=oKzI0zjzBpwOlMA8OmHjGZODtF95SNZAG5eLaQm0AX9tUW925TXyRCrqpk7phFk01CxMeBye4fFl68tUWCSQ9OIDJjjymObVfS0t65CC9P6bv8opCZhWvwcTCIBD1Yt9Xm+SKjK5nEGcCPvB5OrPVs+QH5WFWFE/KL28B9xTjuM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772100167; c=relaxed/simple; bh=biKqRyvpWuguXFm/8QPIOZ5OjWV5g0hWS/d8h9nLg4k=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Lzt3+Y5oE4j2NamuG/8AF8iFYjzsEg+o/nfExrluPchz8O4cVvVcTIsvaBEgXC7st7ZRaYbemFYsB06vHZoMmwPizn56/3gYCe+Bw3bKu+urHHl/qoW+TFTq07yR78LjQsB8hwAiSZGFwh6kaKIBUhicvSjKFSH2GFaD9NWz0Zk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=k5mcq+9j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="k5mcq+9j" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2891FC19422; Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:02:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772100167; bh=biKqRyvpWuguXFm/8QPIOZ5OjWV5g0hWS/d8h9nLg4k=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=k5mcq+9jHOWQHwCsIwdPytzf22xUG1PXgxXrh1jZEGbut8FBQSnZffk41jdeNMa9r RxCt/YDDTmSJfBMNY6FUuoxqEzsV7QIHEfzVdHXNlRZoxCZ9iZTNvJcTIiuYapadcv FCwvSYs1yjkihMGxMaewrJBiKgzeM5TOMiwZBkYvF9ya+o8JPgNBRQ1J/rI/Tl6Kyy 2tjnysSQ1QaNQvG2ArYo5qapPY1hDURLbBSh0nHrPSahNAswY7MitJ5FZCJ9Xbcnr0 XlCkAbf+6rQCu5UnaqNY/wAVwTOCV0b+Cn0Bz85PBkzDuIf6alj1usL6I/dg6qN4mn ofmO9koIbDOtA== Message-ID: <751a94a7-d5b2-415e-9591-a7d97b452d81@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:02:43 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Saturate to SIZE_MAX for allocation size overflows Content-Language: en-US To: Kees Cook , Matthew Wilcox Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Roman Gushchin , Harry Yoo , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org References: <20260225013954.work.319-kees@kernel.org> <202602242315.C9D5430C7@keescook> From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" In-Reply-To: <202602242315.C9D5430C7@keescook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/25/26 08:15, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 03:59:08AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 05:40:02PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h >> > @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static inline __alloc_size(1, 2) void *kmalloc_array_noprof(size_t n, size_t siz >> > size_t bytes; >> > >> > if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(n, size, &bytes))) >> > - return NULL; >> > + bytes = SIZE_MAX; >> > return kmalloc_noprof(bytes, flags); >> >> Wouldn't this be better written as: >> >> return kmalloc_noprof(size_mul(n, size), flags); >> >> (etc) > > Sure, I can convert them all that way if that's preferred? Yeah I think it's better than effectively open-code the same thing?