Linux Hardening
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	John Ogness <jogness@linutronix.de>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: ringbuffer: Add KUnit test
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:02:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEmMdirOERyv8COG@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506-printk-ringbuffer-test-v2-1-152200569eb1@linutronix.de>

On Tue 2025-05-06 13:58:48, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The KUnit test validates the correct operation of the ringbuffer.
> A separate dedicated ringbuffer is used so that the global printk
> ringbuffer is not touched.
> 
> Co-developed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1685,6 +1686,7 @@ bool prb_reserve(struct prb_reserved_entry *e, struct printk_ringbuffer *rb,
>  	memset(r, 0, sizeof(*r));
>  	return false;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(prb_reserve);
>
>  /* Commit the data (possibly finalizing it) and restore interrupts. */
>  static void _prb_commit(struct prb_reserved_entry *e, unsigned long state_val)

[...]

I had to add:

@@ -2337,6 +2337,7 @@ void prb_init(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb,
 	infos[0].seq = -(u64)_DESCS_COUNT(descbits);
 	infos[_DESCS_COUNT(descbits) - 1].seq = 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(prb_init);
 
 /**
  * prb_record_text_space() - Query the full actual used ringbuffer space for

> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0d60b2273b710b9b7ecf41b37503beeb76703054
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,292 @@

[...]

> +struct prbtest_wakeup_timer {
> +	struct timer_list timer;
> +	struct task_struct *task;
> +};
> +
> +static void prbtest_wakeup_callback(struct timer_list *timer)
> +{
> +	struct prbtest_wakeup_timer *wakeup = from_timer(wakeup, timer, timer);

Just for record. The function from_timer() has been renamed
to timer_container_of() by the commit 41cb08555c4164996
("treewide, timers: Rename from_timer() to timer_container_of()")
in v6.16-rc1.

> +	set_tsk_thread_flag(wakeup->task, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL);
> +	wake_up_process(wakeup->task);
> +}
> +
> +static int prbtest_reader(struct prbtest_data *test_data, unsigned long timeout_ms)
> +{
> +	struct prbtest_wakeup_timer wakeup;
> +	char text_buf[MAX_PRB_RECORD_SIZE];
> +	unsigned long count = 0;
> +	struct printk_info info;
> +	struct printk_record r;
> +	u64 seq = 0;
> +
> +	wakeup.task = current;
> +	timer_setup_on_stack(&wakeup.timer, prbtest_wakeup_callback, 0);
> +	mod_timer(&wakeup.timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
> +
> +	prb_rec_init_rd(&r, &info, text_buf, sizeof(text_buf));
> +
> +	kunit_info(test_data->test, "start reader\n");
> +
> +	while (!wait_event_interruptible(test_data->new_record_wait,
> +					 prb_read_valid(test_data->ringbuffer, seq, &r))) {
> +		/* check/track the sequence */
> +		if (info.seq < seq)
> +			KUNIT_FAIL(test_data->test, "BAD SEQ READ: request=%llu read=%llu\n",
> +				   seq, info.seq);
> +
> +		if (!prbtest_check_data((struct prbtest_rbdata *)r.text_buf))
> +			prbtest_fail_record(test_data->test,
> +					    (struct prbtest_rbdata *)r.text_buf, info.seq);
> +
> +		if ((count++ & 0x3fff) == 0)
> +			cond_resched();
> +
> +		seq = info.seq + 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	timer_delete_sync(&wakeup.timer);
> +	destroy_timer_on_stack(&wakeup.timer);

Also this function has been renamed by the commit
aad823aa3a7d675a8d0 ("treewide, timers: Rename
destroy_timer_on_stack() as timer_destroy_on_stack()")
in v6.16-rc1.

> +
> +	kunit_info(test_data->test, "end reader: read=%lu seq=%llu\n", count, info.seq);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

[...]

> +static void test_readerwriter(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	/* Equivalent to CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=13 */
> +	DEFINE_PRINTKRB(test_rb, 8, 5);
> +
> +	struct prbtest_thread_data *thread_data;
> +	struct prbtest_data *test_data;
> +	struct task_struct *thread;
> +	cpumask_t test_cpus;
> +	int cpu, reader_cpu;
> +
> +	cpus_read_lock();
> +	/*
> +	 * Failure of KUNIT_ASSERT() kills the current task
> +	 * so it can not be called while the CPU hotplug lock is held.
> +	 * Instead use a snapshot of the online CPUs.
> +	 * If they change during test execution it is unfortunate but not a grave error.
> +	 */
> +	cpumask_copy(&test_cpus, cpu_online_mask);
> +	cpus_read_unlock();
> +
> +	/* One CPU is for the reader, all others are writers */
> +	reader_cpu = cpumask_first(&test_cpus);
> +	if (cpumask_weight(&test_cpus) == 1)
> +		kunit_warn(test, "more than one CPU is recommended");
> +	else
> +		cpumask_clear_cpu(reader_cpu, &test_cpus);
> +

I was curious why the reinit (below) was needed. We did not need this for
the default printk log buffer (printk_rb_static).

My understanding is that we need this because the unit test might be
started more times. It might be worth a comment. Something like:

	/* KUnit tests cat be re-started more times. */
> +	prbtest_prb_reinit(&test_rb);
> +
> +	test_data = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*test_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, test_data);
> +	test_data->test = test;
> +	test_data->ringbuffer = &test_rb;
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&test_data->new_record_wait);
> +
> +	kunit_info(test, "running for %lu ms\n", runtime_ms);
> +
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, &test_cpus) {
> +		thread_data = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*thread_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, thread_data);
> +		thread_data->test_data = test_data;
> +		thread_data->num = cpu;
> +
> +		thread = kthread_run_on_cpu(prbtest_writer, thread_data, cpu,
> +					    "prbtest writer %u");
> +		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, thread);
> +		prbtest_add_kthread_cleanup(test, thread);
> +	}
> +
> +	kunit_info(test, "starting test\n");
> +
> +	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(reader_cpu));
> +	prbtest_reader(test_data, runtime_ms);
> +
> +	kunit_info(test, "completed test\n");
> +}

Otherwise, it looks good to me.

I would push it with the timer API renames so that it works in
Linus' master and linux-next out of box. So, with the following
changes:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
index 7d75cf2e15c6..bc811de18316 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
@@ -2337,6 +2337,7 @@ void prb_init(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb,
 	infos[0].seq = -(u64)_DESCS_COUNT(descbits);
 	infos[_DESCS_COUNT(descbits) - 1].seq = 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(prb_init);
 
 /**
  * prb_record_text_space() - Query the full actual used ringbuffer space for
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c
index 0d60b2273b71..6a24294b85f5 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer_kunit_test.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ struct prbtest_wakeup_timer {
 
 static void prbtest_wakeup_callback(struct timer_list *timer)
 {
-	struct prbtest_wakeup_timer *wakeup = from_timer(wakeup, timer, timer);
+	struct prbtest_wakeup_timer *wakeup = timer_container_of(wakeup, timer, timer);
 
 	set_tsk_thread_flag(wakeup->task, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL);
 	wake_up_process(wakeup->task);
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int prbtest_reader(struct prbtest_data *test_data, unsigned long timeout_
 	}
 
 	timer_delete_sync(&wakeup.timer);
-	destroy_timer_on_stack(&wakeup.timer);
+	timer_destroy_on_stack(&wakeup.timer);
 
 	kunit_info(test_data->test, "end reader: read=%lu seq=%llu\n", count, info.seq);
 
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static void test_readerwriter(struct kunit *test)
 	else
 		cpumask_clear_cpu(reader_cpu, &test_cpus);
 
+	/* KUnit test can get restarted more times. */
 	prbtest_prb_reinit(&test_rb);
 
 	test_data = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*test_data), GFP_KERNEL);


Best Regards,
Petr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-11 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06 11:58 [PATCH v2] printk: ringbuffer: Add KUnit test Thomas Weißschuh
2025-05-08  8:07 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-11 14:02 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2025-06-11 14:40   ` Thomas Weißschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEmMdirOERyv8COG@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=jogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox