Linux Hardening
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cgroup: Use __counted_by for cgroup::ancestors
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 06:09:42 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUQnRqJsjh9p9Vhb@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cc0370-1924-4d33-bbf1-7fc2b03149e3@huaweicloud.com>

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:09:32PM +0800, Chen Ridong wrote:
> Note that this level may already be used in existing BPF programs (e.g.,
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_uptr.c). Do we need to consider compatibility here?

That's a good point. Is __counted_by instrumentation tied to some compiler
flag? If so, might as well make it an optional extra field specifically for
the annotation rather than changing the meaning of an existing field.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-17 16:27 [PATCH 0/4] Use __counted_by for ancestor arrays Michal Koutný
2025-12-17 16:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] cgroup: Use __counted_by for cgroup::ancestors Michal Koutný
2025-12-18  7:09   ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-18 16:09     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2025-12-18 16:32       ` Michal Koutný
2026-01-06  6:53         ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2025-12-19  8:33       ` Kees Cook
2025-12-17 16:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-iocost: Correct comment ioc_gq::level Michal Koutný
2025-12-17 16:57   ` Tejun Heo
2025-12-17 19:02     ` Michal Koutný

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aUQnRqJsjh9p9Vhb@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox