From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 105/108] pwm: Ensure a struct pwm has the same lifetime as its pwm_chip
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 09:53:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b44c4a7d-4f86-4d53-8f11-ffeef91e1407@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121134901.208535-106-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
On 11/21/23 07:50, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> It's required to not free the memory underlying a requested PWM
> while a consumer still has a reference to it. While currently a pwm_chip
> doesn't life long enough in all cases, linking the struct pwm to the
> pwm_chip results in the right lifetime as soon as the pwmchip is living
> long enough. This happens with the following commits.
>
> Note this is a breaking change for all pwm drivers that don't use
> pwmchip_alloc().
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> # for struct_size() and __counted_by()
Thanks for including __counted_by(). :)
--
Gustavo
> ---
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> include/linux/pwm.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> index 15942210aa08..029aa1c69591 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_chip *chip)
>
> void *pwmchip_priv(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> {
> - return (void *)chip + sizeof(*chip);
> + return (void *)chip + struct_size(chip, pwms, chip->npwm);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwmchip_priv);
>
> @@ -206,8 +206,9 @@ struct pwm_chip *devm_pwmchip_alloc(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm, si
> {
> struct pwm_chip *chip;
> size_t alloc_size;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> - alloc_size = size_add(sizeof(*chip), sizeof_priv);
> + alloc_size = size_add(struct_size(chip, pwms, npwm), sizeof_priv);
>
> chip = devm_kzalloc(parent, alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!chip)
> @@ -217,6 +218,13 @@ struct pwm_chip *devm_pwmchip_alloc(struct device *parent, unsigned int npwm, si
> chip->npwm = npwm;
> chip->uses_pwmchip_alloc = true;
>
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->npwm; i++) {
> + struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
> +
> + pwm->chip = chip;
> + pwm->hwpwm = i;
> + }
> +
> return chip;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_pwmchip_alloc);
> @@ -234,7 +242,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_pwmchip_alloc);
> int __pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct module *owner)
> {
> int ret;
> - unsigned i;
>
> if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -253,26 +260,15 @@ int __pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct module *owner)
>
> chip->owner = owner;
>
> - chip->pwms = kcalloc(chip->npwm, sizeof(*chip->pwms), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!chip->pwms)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
>
> ret = idr_alloc(&pwmchip_idr, chip, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ret < 0) {
> mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
> - kfree(chip->pwms);
> return ret;
> }
>
> chip->id = ret;
> - for (i = 0; i < chip->npwm; i++) {
> - struct pwm_device *pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
> -
> - pwm->chip = chip;
> - pwm->hwpwm = i;
> - }
>
> mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
>
> @@ -303,8 +299,6 @@ void pwmchip_remove(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> idr_remove(&pwmchip_idr, chip->id);
>
> mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
> -
> - kfree(chip->pwms);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwmchip_remove);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
> index b8e70ee01d31..a7294ef1495d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pwm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ struct pwm_chip {
>
> /* only used internally by the PWM framework */
> bool uses_pwmchip_alloc;
> - struct pwm_device *pwms;
> + struct pwm_device pwms[] __counted_by(npwm);
> };
>
> static inline struct device *pwmchip_parent(struct pwm_chip *chip)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-21 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 13:49 [PATCH v3 000/108] pwm: Fix lifetime issues for pwm_chips Uwe Kleine-König
2023-11-21 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 105/108] pwm: Ensure a struct pwm has the same lifetime as its pwm_chip Uwe Kleine-König
2023-11-21 15:53 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b44c4a7d-4f86-4d53-8f11-ffeef91e1407@embeddedor.com \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox