From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 14:41:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b66caca8-a8d8-4081-b462-92a95a7fa830@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240211175143.9229-1-erick.archer@gmx.com>
On 2/11/24 11:51, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
>
> Here the multiplication is obviously safe because DMAR_LATENCY_NUM
> is the number of latency types defined in the "latency_type" enum.
>
> enum latency_type {
> DMAR_LATENCY_INV_IOTLB = 0,
> DMAR_LATENCY_INV_DEVTLB,
> DMAR_LATENCY_INV_IEC,
> DMAR_LATENCY_PRQ,
> DMAR_LATENCY_NUM
> };
>
> However, using kcalloc() is more appropriate [2] and improves
> readability. This patch has no effect on runtime behavior.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [1]
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [2]
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Thanks!
--
Gustavo
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c
> index 94ee70ac38e3..adc4de6bbd88 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int dmar_latency_enable(struct intel_iommu *iommu, enum latency_type type)
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&latency_lock, flags);
> if (!iommu->perf_statistic) {
> - iommu->perf_statistic = kzalloc(sizeof(*lstat) * DMAR_LATENCY_NUM,
> + iommu->perf_statistic = kcalloc(DMAR_LATENCY_NUM, sizeof(*lstat),
> GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!iommu->perf_statistic) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-11 17:51 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc() Erick Archer
2024-02-12 18:31 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-12 20:41 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2024-02-26 6:09 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b66caca8-a8d8-4081-b462-92a95a7fa830@embeddedor.com \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox