From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "Malcolm Priestley" <tvboxspy@gmail.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Petr Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
"Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] module: Add compile-time check for embedded NUL characters
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:27:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3e5b44f-9944-474c-9850-39e91b0ae7ea@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251008033844.work.801-kees@kernel.org>
On 08/10/2025 05:59, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A long time ago we had an issue with embedded NUL bytes in MODULE_INFO
> strings[1]. While this stands out pretty strongly when you look at the
> code, and we can't do anything about a binary module that just plain lies,
> we never actually implemented the trivial compile-time check needed to
> detect it.
>
> Add this check (and fix 2 instances of needless trailing semicolons that
> this change exposed).
>
> Note that these patches were produced as part of another LLM exercise.
> This time I wanted to try "what happens if I ask an LLM to go read
> a specific LWN article and write a patch based on a discussion?" It
> pretty effortlessly chose and implemented a suggested solution, tested
> the change, and fixed new build warnings in the process.
>
> Since this was a relatively short session, here's an overview of the
> prompts involved as I guided it through a clean change and tried to see
> how it would reason about static_assert vs _Static_assert. (It wanted
> to use what was most common, not what was the current style -- we may
> want to update the comment above the static_assert macro to suggest
> using _Static_assert directly these days...)
>
> I want to fix a weakness in the module info strings. Read about it
> here: https://lwn.net/Articles/82305/
>
> Since it's only "info" that we need to check, can you reduce the checks
> to just that instead of all the other stuff?
>
> I think the change to the comment is redundent, and that should be
> in a commit log instead. Let's just keep the change to the static assert.
>
> Is "static_assert" the idiomatic way to use a static assert in this
> code base? I've seen _Static_assert used sometimes.
>
> What's the difference between the two?
>
> Does Linux use C11 by default now?
>
> Then let's not use the wrapper any more.
>
> Do an "allmodconfig all -s" build to verify this works for all modules
> in the kernel.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Kees
>
> [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/82305/
>
> Kees Cook (3):
> media: dvb-usb-v2: lmedm04: Fix firmware macro definitions
> media: radio: si470x: Fix DRIVER_AUTHOR macro definition
> module: Add compile-time check for embedded NUL characters
I reviewed the two media patches. Feel free to take this series.
If you prefer that I take the two media patches, then let me know
but it makes more sense in this case that you take all three.
Regards,
Hans
>
> include/linux/moduleparam.h | 3 +++
> drivers/media/radio/si470x/radio-si470x-i2c.c | 2 +-
> drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb-v2/lmedm04.c | 12 ++++++------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-08 3:59 [PATCH 0/3] module: Add compile-time check for embedded NUL characters Kees Cook
2025-10-08 3:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] media: dvb-usb-v2: lmedm04: Fix firmware macro definitions Kees Cook
2025-10-08 6:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2025-10-08 3:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] media: radio: si470x: Fix DRIVER_AUTHOR macro definition Kees Cook
2025-10-08 6:24 ` Hans Verkuil
2025-10-08 3:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] module: Add compile-time check for embedded NUL characters Kees Cook
2025-10-08 9:55 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-12-08 21:05 ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-09 0:11 ` Eric Biggers
2025-12-09 8:18 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-12-09 16:20 ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-09 16:45 ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-09 18:29 ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-10 1:00 ` Sami Tolvanen
2025-12-10 22:29 ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-11 8:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-12-11 17:03 ` Sami Tolvanen
2025-12-11 17:30 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-12-11 17:51 ` Sami Tolvanen
2025-12-19 12:45 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-12-19 16:21 ` Luck, Tony
2026-01-08 8:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-18 6:50 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-02-19 17:04 ` Chris Li
2025-10-08 6:27 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3e5b44f-9944-474c-9850-39e91b0ae7ea@kernel.org \
--to=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=tvboxspy@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox