From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [patch v2 01/35] Hexagon: Add generic headers Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:00:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1400760.2CJ9v55MlQ@wuerfel> References: <20110830190729.923334292@codeaurora.org> <201108311524.42373.arnd@arndb.de> <20110831195111.GA29918@huya.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110831195111.GA29918@huya.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Brown Cc: Richard Kuo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 31 August 2011 12:51:11 David Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:24:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011, Richard Kuo wrote: > > > Reworked to use the Kbuild generic headers mechanism. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Kuo > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Any suggestions on what path this code should flow to get into the > kernel? It should get into linux-next now and then get submitted directly to Linus at the start of the merge window. I'm happy to take anything that concerns hexagon and arm likewise into the arm-soc tree. While I am the de-facto gatekeeper for new architectures, I have not seen a reason to start a consolidated minor-architectures tree to collect these. Arnd