From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v3 19/36] Hexagon: Add ptrace support
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:29:57 +0100
Message-ID: <201109101229.58445.pedro@codesourcery.com>
References: <20110909010847.294039464@codeaurora.org> <20110909211808.GA3150@codeaurora.org> <CACM3HyH8P=u9pR0sa2besxsgDN5TUKg_7utLJTwL+hu8Wv48ow@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACM3HyH8P=u9pR0sa2besxsgDN5TUKg_7utLJTwL+hu8Wv48ow@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-hexagon.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linas Vepstas (Code Aurora)" <linas@codeaurora.org>, Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de

On Saturday 10 September 2011 07:42:26, Jonas Bonn wrote:

> I'm really not an expert on GDB, but I believe it can use either the
> PEEK/POKE functions to access regs, or it can use GET/SETREGS; it's an
> architecture-dependent configuration.  I think the second variant can
> be easily modified to become GET/SETREGSET instead, and the PEEK/POKE
> variant wouldn't be needed at all.

Yes, the x86/x86-64 ports or gdb and gdbserver are already
using GET/SETREGSET even.

-- 
Pedro Alves