From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] futex: remove duplicated code Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 15:08:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20170303140837.GF5319@osiris> References: <20170303122712.13353-1-jslaby@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170303122712.13353-1-jslaby@suse.cz> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jiri Slaby Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Vineet Gupta , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Richard Kuo , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Ralf Baechle , Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , Stafford Horne , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:27:10PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > There is code duplicated over all architecture's headers for > futex_atomic_op_inuser. Namely op decoding, access_ok check for uaddr, > and comparison of the result. > > Remove this duplication and leave up to the arches only the needed > assembly which is now in arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser. > > Note that s390 removed access_ok check in d12a29703 ("s390/uaccess: > remove pointless access_ok() checks") as access_ok there returns true. > We introduce it back to the helper for the sake of simplicity (it gets > optimized away anyway). > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/futex.h | 23 ++++------------- > include/asm-generic/futex.h | 50 +++++++------------------------------ > kernel/futex.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Looks good to me and still boots on s390. Therefore for the s390 bits: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens Thanks!