From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Kuo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hexagon: fix ffz/fls/ffs return type Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 20:35:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20180408013525.GE3036@codeaurora.org> References: <20180406142832.2243021-1-arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1523151328; bh=GEvtb404zT5+/Gp4ZLE0W8dHnOs3CO62LItd6Nb4ibA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JKZyPNB9TaRQB3GQj81CDYAUvCPzU4WA6KTmCayNoEzM7NNyqVgZYaRCl1Kr+dmph T+HZ9gMTvtrzCALjGGPt2h0uNSbfCck8rLDCsOOxQ7GgZrmhKpI5/r+xsG7ooZWxeu HRjjzT/4SZTdoQ36TxntR71+bxg8F3gh1tu77PG4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1523151327; bh=GEvtb404zT5+/Gp4ZLE0W8dHnOs3CO62LItd6Nb4ibA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hFexcBCrXfZDVkEo5oUt76vgWFWfi6ZVgVB7CtyIwBm4BPfxO/AINTixCjK5D1MyS IYMzLZIJpmAoonuchEdK4W/4MQ7BRojDyOUZFM8tKzTIl9y3zl4k3bvS5qMZXeDu2X qb6lOvXq1XlZjPsXF3Y4DCDY+ruS3ZRnTLuvhsV0= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180406142832.2243021-1-arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Let's use the same return type as the major architectures to > avoid warnings like > > drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c: In function 'ahci_platform_init_host': > drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c:561:12: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default] > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h > index 5e4a59b3ec1b..8790a50b1f5e 100644 > --- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h > +++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/bitops.h > @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static inline int __test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr) > * > * Undefined if no zero exists, so code should check against ~0UL first. > */ > -static inline long ffz(int x) > +static inline int ffz(int x) > { > int r; > > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static inline long ffz(int x) > * This is defined the same way as ffs. > * Note fls(0) = 0, fls(1) = 1, fls(0x80000000) = 32. > */ > -static inline long fls(int x) > +static inline int fls(int x) > { > int r; > > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static inline long fls(int x) > * the libc and compiler builtin ffs routines, therefore > * differs in spirit from the above ffz (man ffs). > */ > -static inline long ffs(int x) > +static inline int ffs(int x) > { > int r; > Isn't ffz usually long/unsigned long on other architectures? -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project