From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:55:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20190211105537.GA59133@gmail.com> References: <1549850450-10171-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <20190211071159.GA55579@gmail.com> <20190211103927.GA118071@gmail.com> <20190211105214.GA30880@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KMN64kOtJBFkKLD7eH5E1tsIkp4xo4LmSrCHlHm3ADQ=; b=QDtcr3wyAWwC1Feiwyp3X/8YTfaIdNpEWSGZejYjQTG/rj0trYk0vC6rQn4y2cNbXv il1Avd23/d1Hd8k+uTbZBtAoIRuLEkjW3uPerX4NcbTux104Th18LvFAtlUMw0zOO1LL tLmqEa0y4zRbQ5L3wXHA0BYGnh9on2hBdn58O1L8DaUmAwdWpiMdKB6WiTyS7C6wf6Bh MC78xcq2N19Sr8d1ee6X2SFh4BhB3mZOszFFAIe2XAVy/T1Xcb8vx1blQzxEH3d3ygOa 1lUqargunUNH4IWUAEw1tmMjRZ4VOjSK4lFppReznME5P372JKKIbFQpvePfCELqMthw iSVw== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190211105214.GA30880@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Will Deacon Cc: Waiman Long , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Davidlohr Bueso , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Tim Chen * Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:39:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > Sounds good to me - I've merged this patch, will push it out after > > > testing. > > > > Based on Peter's feedback I'm delaying this - performance testing on at > > least one key ll/sc arch would be nice indeed. > > Once Waiman has posted a new version, I can take it for a spin on some > arm64 boxen if he shares his workload. Cool, thanks! Ingo