From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 20:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> References: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: References:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=5Y5FG1XEVxvf9IK2l4OFuLfssAaEsRuwVLBuvenNYys=; b=GVC/vJCKrBJ7D5 fnH53b5mpNcVp+9smNaye3Xnfz4Z5gHEwZeSIfgTkdWwsMMoNsDrH2FhhyVYfLYimBf9wHdCLkQDQ 9Qvzw63tEVoMBAqS79w1rKU0Il2aPIX52GD1SQPEjU+mNRDatqizOJsIFqG5MukyFezzUj99TKouo ZQI1R/JtbjPiisyVFtAOX5Bpk/PiGiWjjH6LcnwhNR1+RSltZECvCMsM5EV88lIBMytNgsJ7BtjjJ uH11J7HEVej6RXU24nDmk7WE8Ze5xeJ9KVP2ZVT/ep69DSfiRFnhiK9ws6zpLxLFVAlx1P37GFBeT y6+MpfOkTTKeSg53GSdg==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+glpr-linux-riscv=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Kuo , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will > just create conflicts with my series.. I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both series as a single set. Preferences? -- Sincerely yours, Mike.