From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.or>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 10:23:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111012336.GA85185@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108130447.h3wfgo4efjkto56f@pathway.suse.cz>
On (19/11/08 14:04), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> I agree that it is complicated to pass the loglevel as
> a parameter. It would be better define the default
> log level for a given code section. It might be stored
> in task_struct for the normal context and in per-CPU
> variables for interrupt contexts.
I do recall that we talked about per-CPU printk state bit which would
start/end "just print it" section. We probably can extend it to "just
log_store" type of functionality. Doesn't look like a very bad idea.
"This task/context is in trouble, whatever it printk()-s is important".
Per-console loglevel also might help sometimes. Slower consoles would
->write() only critical messages, faster consoles everything.
Passing log_level as part of message payload, which printk machinery
magically hides is not entirely exciting. What we have in the code
now - printk("%s blah\n", lvl) - is not what we see in the logs.
Because the leading '%s' becomes special. And printk()/sprintf()
documentation should reflect that: '%s' prints a string, but sometimes
it doesn't.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-06 3:04 [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack() Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-06 3:05 ` [PATCH 14/50] hexagon: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-06 8:35 ` [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack() Petr Mladek
2019-11-06 16:12 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-08 10:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-08 13:04 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-11 1:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2019-11-11 9:12 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-12 4:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-12 4:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-12 8:35 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-12 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 1:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 2:25 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-13 6:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 8:47 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-13 16:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-13 16:40 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-15 0:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 15:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-11 19:47 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-12 2:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-12 2:40 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-12 4:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 2:41 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-13 2:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-15 3:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-06 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 16:27 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-06 20:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 23:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-13 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-08 16:28 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-08 17:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-08 21:08 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-13 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191111012336.GA85185@google.com \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dima@arista.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.or \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).