From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack() Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:23:37 +0900 Message-ID: <20191113012337.GA70781@google.com> References: <20191106030542.868541-1-dima@arista.com> <20191106083538.z5nlpuf64cigxigh@pathway.suse.cz> <20191108103719.GB175344@google.com> <20191108130447.h3wfgo4efjkto56f@pathway.suse.cz> <20191111012336.GA85185@google.com> <20191111091207.u3lrd6cmumnx4czr@pathway.suse.cz> <20191112044447.GA121272@google.com> <20191112045704.GA138013@google.com> <20191112083509.gmgjpkjffsfaw5lm@pathway.suse.cz> <20191112101229.GA201294@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=yOqDuqb+68NvBk8Q4OnzdNWpqSkOjQtT2EUbyWOAr7c=; b=D4OILMKTtCKD9M fQ8kfaI8o0zqZY8tWlsgTZ5lTn4wyYI8O5j54d6OdgvIj14nxVpmFH3GY9TIKlEbfob+3fUdO+M4U m+SvHG+Q57xV1hhBtgtGSYLzifi28Mi1+WHsgm0IOiMn9DMH511V+6IdbFMzOmA+nVPVcPz5hKmZQ VN7mH4hdPnULfVqgNhPsLXcdh8FKxqrfTXlbvzLgkZCcg0VQ9tGIRxO9PG+/DREEYfCQhaOPtqi50 6ptF48bQG1tfmOcE/Vj1w+UAgQtQzOpvFkBEFRoVZS5VmCmL3DVMp6VpHdBaKb7SoxUD/94kVW8HM btf1uIpz2Ejy8+JWrKUg==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1L7ASzKkM9H3jGXxNBrUB+7DORYDzuzDLILdAI3Iz7A=; b=hPWPZKlqyeQnXDnfKM+yto4tna7/NwAt3iB5d61vGkkJIZuUufxmpnoxkEgePVnej7 L3hqEC23l+0zKgGK6W4wPhhfu5rKZowqxPh/46+GMjsQYom9+rxAtKscDZa4tq1EZ716 v3E2zlUhIldCXA7DVyUqyyBaEbvglPUOrZExWlUjNqVUbKviWiZ0UqqlQQn5uS5GaAHc mq/bIirdXr39H9gdTuhjl1CNb4pz9u1NyVaytreQwY9zEl/crJdG04QmPFkkR8rnNcTE UvMTM+CfzewoFMwCfZcUTuuW9mgMTzeza8o6UpjTQJvYoUxBVhuX8rWLl3B8wj02ljU3 maaw== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191112101229.GA201294@google.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+glpr-linux-riscv=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Petr Mladek , Dmitry Safonov Cc: Juri Lelli , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Ben Segall , Guo Ren , Pavel Machek , Vincent Guittot , Paul Burton , Michael Ellerman , Geert Uytterhoeven , Mel Gorman , Jiri Slaby , Matt Turner , uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, Len Brown , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Dietmar Eggemann , Richard Henderson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" On (19/11/12 19:12), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (19/11/12 09:35), Petr Mladek wrote: > [..] > > This is getting too complicated. It would introduce too many > > hidden rules. While the explicitly passed loglevel parameter > > is straightforward and clear. > > If loglevel is DEFAULT or NOTICE or INFO then we can overwrite it > (either downgrade or upgrade). That's one rule, basically. Not too > complicated, I guess. Can be taken even a bit further than show_stack(NULL, NULL, LOGLEVEL_DEBUG); or show_stack(NULL, NULL, LOGLEVEL_ERR); For instance, spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags); printk_emergency_enter(LOGLEVEL_SCHED); ... show_stack(...); printk(); printk(); ... spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags); or spin_lock_irqsave(&uart_port->lock, flags); printk_emergency_enter(LOGLEVEL_SCHED); ... printk(); printk(); ... and so on. -ss