From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" Subject: [PATCH v2 34/34] mm: Remove pgtable_{pmd, pte}_page_{ctor, dtor}() wrappers Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 12:28:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20230501192829.17086-35-vishal.moola@gmail.com> References: <20230501192829.17086-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682969364; x=1685561364; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tVP5uHyitpWmGyZGGmBmuGVwAuiqA5RrNeRETZrKFQk=; b=l3gNIC841LsuGqQQ2UpVF+XnHjZ+kiBXZeZy4GTzDMbWbXaEiG5ArSl/ydDvotE01/ fGJ2+A5T8Q0iCPtlIlo1cxl3Uf1AxNVghNXp2wCgxamPWRN0f7NM89uS/eqg02SKiRak np/AOUUvT9Iq32lA1ArHNRu1TUuWBGP97diP1cbyLES/I8a8uq904CtHM5VcyBKmIx8g ULh11nFUApu/c5GfuUXZpzFhh6lYLhMsU4hm7q2aFdXWAxNpZKe/ScDOD1gC9EPME0aI 4wA9wQgJ9NzOXeiB1g9JMqcyyqFI/8Wvj0CTUQfo5zcTDuOrG/ytNAkFcETgxxSn2sbl hW5Q== In-Reply-To: <20230501192829.17086-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" These functions are no longer necessary. Remove them and cleanup Documentation referencing them. Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) --- Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 12 +++++------ .../zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 14 ++++++------- include/linux/mm.h | 20 ------------------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 50ee0dfc95be..b3c612183135 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Support of split page table lock by an architecture =================================================== There's no need in special enabling of PTE split page table lock: everything -required is done by pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pte_page_dtor(), which +required is done by ptdesc_pte_ctor() and ptdesc_pte_dtor(), which must be called on PTE table allocation / freeing. Make sure the architecture doesn't use slab allocator for page table @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ This field shares storage with page->ptl. PMD split lock only makes sense if you have more than two page table levels. -PMD split lock enabling requires pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() call on PMD table -allocation and pgtable_pmd_page_dtor() on freeing. +PMD split lock enabling requires ptdesc_pmd_ctor() call on PMD table +allocation and ptdesc_pmd_dtor() on freeing. Allocation usually happens in pmd_alloc_one(), freeing in pmd_free() and pmd_free_tlb(), but make sure you cover all PMD table allocation / freeing @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ paths: i.e X86_PAE preallocate few PMDs on pgd_alloc(). With everything in place you can set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. -NOTE: pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail -- it must +NOTE: ptdesc_pte_ctor() and ptdesc_pmd_ctor() can fail -- it must be handled properly. page->ptl @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ trick: split lock with enabled DEBUG_SPINLOCK or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, but costs one more cache line for indirect access; -The spinlock_t allocated in pgtable_pte_page_ctor() for PTE table and in -pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() for PMD table. +The spinlock_t allocated in ptdesc_pte_ctor() for PTE table and in +ptdesc_pmd_ctor() for PMD table. Please, never access page->ptl directly -- use appropriate helper. diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 4fb7aa666037..a3323eb9dc40 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -56,16 +56,16 @@ Hugetlb特定的辅助函数: 架构对分页表锁的支持 ==================== -没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pgtable_pte_page_ctor() -和pgtable_pte_page_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 +没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由ptdesc_pte_ctor() +和ptdesc_pte_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 确保架构不使用slab分配器来分配页表：slab使用page->slab_cache来分配其页 面。这个区域与page->ptl共享存储。 PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 -启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()，在释放时调 -用pgtable_pmd_page_dtor()。 +启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用ptdesc_pmd_ctor()，在释放时调 +用ptdesc_pmd_dtor()。 分配通常发生在pmd_alloc_one()中，释放发生在pmd_free()和pmd_free_tlb() 中，但要确保覆盖所有的PMD表分配/释放路径：即X86_PAE在pgd_alloc()中预先 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 一切就绪后，你可以设置CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK。 -注意：pgtable_pte_page_ctor()和pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()可能失败--必 +注意：ptdesc_pte_ctor()和ptdesc_pmd_ctor()可能失败--必 须正确处理。 page->ptl @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ page->ptl用于访问分割页表锁，其中'page'是包含该表的页面struc 的指针并动态分配它。这允许在启用DEBUG_SPINLOCK或DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC的 情况下使用分页锁，但由于间接访问而多花了一个缓存行。 -PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pgtable_pte_page_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t -分配在pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()中。 +PTE表的spinlock_t分配在ptdesc_pte_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t +分配在ptdesc_pmd_ctor()中。 请不要直接访问page->ptl - -使用适当的辅助函数。 diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index dc61aeca9077..dfa3e202099a 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2858,11 +2858,6 @@ static inline bool ptdesc_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pte_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return ptdesc_pte_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void ptdesc_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -2872,11 +2867,6 @@ static inline void ptdesc_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - ptdesc_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - #define pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, address, ptlp) \ ({ \ spinlock_t *__ptl = pte_lockptr(mm, pmd); \ @@ -2967,11 +2957,6 @@ static inline bool ptdesc_pmd_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pmd_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return ptdesc_pmd_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void ptdesc_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -2981,11 +2966,6 @@ static inline void ptdesc_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - ptdesc_pmd_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - /* * No scalability reason to split PUD locks yet, but follow the same pattern * as the PMD locks to make it easier if we decide to. The VM should not be -- 2.39.2