From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" Subject: [PATCH v5 33/33] mm: Remove pgtable_{pmd, pte}_page_{ctor, dtor}() wrappers Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 13:57:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20230622205745.79707-34-vishal.moola@gmail.com> References: <20230622205745.79707-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687467545; x=1690059545; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=UurGuuLzED1CKQ5+YtAa+uldlNlkULcrhOlEPtYgkts=; b=oQo8Ww3rkcQ6O4ERZYbbm7gIN+KUZJBSX76Jt+A0yqxzuaw5csFJ7AbMPXoNar1y+V tZQraeqybmf35Qo5xoKl1awKHEBN/Nxr+iHHL+iOhynJPYAD9oID72CJXajJ9Jf7DkVt j26rlavSXJqsTv4JH9m0aLFnC9iK42GCsz7JUCHqTbiCOXGPKTX89JvhbmgJctDtXiKK TITKlfKlRxN76qLZH8F23nvkVHDCJrlE7Pe9NREUl+WlgOK0PObb86E20s865la+XsRl r0ny/7zkkdzJjzv/4f5M4RYeUYdlHDKmxWEXxa021UXcBJ73jIQME8NWHlpzSqT6M39a D91A== In-Reply-To: <20230622205745.79707-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" , Mike Rapoport These functions are no longer necessary. Remove them and cleanup Documentation referencing them. Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) --- Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 12 +++++------ .../zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst | 14 ++++++------- include/linux/mm.h | 20 ------------------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index a834fad9de12..e4f6972eb6c0 100644 --- a/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Support of split page table lock by an architecture =================================================== There's no need in special enabling of PTE split page table lock: everything -required is done by pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pte_page_dtor(), which +required is done by pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pte_dtor(), which must be called on PTE table allocation / freeing. Make sure the architecture doesn't use slab allocator for page table @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ This field shares storage with page->ptl. PMD split lock only makes sense if you have more than two page table levels. -PMD split lock enabling requires pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() call on PMD table -allocation and pgtable_pmd_page_dtor() on freeing. +PMD split lock enabling requires pagetable_pmd_ctor() call on PMD table +allocation and pagetable_pmd_dtor() on freeing. Allocation usually happens in pmd_alloc_one(), freeing in pmd_free() and pmd_free_tlb(), but make sure you cover all PMD table allocation / freeing @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ paths: i.e X86_PAE preallocate few PMDs on pgd_alloc(). With everything in place you can set CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK. -NOTE: pgtable_pte_page_ctor() and pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail -- it must +NOTE: pagetable_pte_ctor() and pagetable_pmd_ctor() can fail -- it must be handled properly. page->ptl @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ trick: split lock with enabled DEBUG_SPINLOCK or DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, but costs one more cache line for indirect access; -The spinlock_t allocated in pgtable_pte_page_ctor() for PTE table and in -pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() for PMD table. +The spinlock_t allocated in pagetable_pte_ctor() for PTE table and in +pagetable_pmd_ctor() for PMD table. Please, never access page->ptl directly -- use appropriate helper. diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst index 4fb7aa666037..a2c288670a24 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/mm/split_page_table_lock.rst @@ -56,16 +56,16 @@ Hugetlb特定的辅助函数: 架构对分页表锁的支持 ==================== -没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pgtable_pte_page_ctor() -和pgtable_pte_page_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 +没有必要特别启用PTE分页表锁：所有需要的东西都由pagetable_pte_ctor() +和pagetable_pte_dtor()完成，它们必须在PTE表分配/释放时被调用。 确保架构不使用slab分配器来分配页表：slab使用page->slab_cache来分配其页 面。这个区域与page->ptl共享存储。 PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 -启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()，在释放时调 -用pgtable_pmd_page_dtor()。 +启用PMD分页锁需要在PMD表分配时调用pagetable_pmd_ctor()，在释放时调 +用pagetable_pmd_dtor()。 分配通常发生在pmd_alloc_one()中，释放发生在pmd_free()和pmd_free_tlb() 中，但要确保覆盖所有的PMD表分配/释放路径：即X86_PAE在pgd_alloc()中预先 @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ PMD分页锁只有在你有两个以上的页表级别时才有意义。 一切就绪后，你可以设置CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK。 -注意：pgtable_pte_page_ctor()和pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()可能失败--必 +注意：pagetable_pte_ctor()和pagetable_pmd_ctor()可能失败--必 须正确处理。 page->ptl @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ page->ptl用于访问分割页表锁，其中'page'是包含该表的页面struc 的指针并动态分配它。这允许在启用DEBUG_SPINLOCK或DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC的 情况下使用分页锁，但由于间接访问而多花了一个缓存行。 -PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pgtable_pte_page_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t -分配在pgtable_pmd_page_ctor()中。 +PTE表的spinlock_t分配在pagetable_pte_ctor()中，PMD表的spinlock_t +分配在pagetable_pmd_ctor()中。 请不要直接访问page->ptl - -使用适当的辅助函数。 diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 0e4d5f6d10e5..dc0f19f35424 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2873,11 +2873,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pte_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pte_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -2887,11 +2882,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pte_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - pte_t *__pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdvalp); static inline pte_t *pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr) { @@ -2993,11 +2983,6 @@ static inline bool pagetable_pmd_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) return true; } -static inline bool pgtable_pmd_page_ctor(struct page *page) -{ - return pagetable_pmd_ctor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { struct folio *folio = ptdesc_folio(ptdesc); @@ -3007,11 +2992,6 @@ static inline void pagetable_pmd_dtor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) lruvec_stat_sub_folio(folio, NR_PAGETABLE); } -static inline void pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(struct page *page) -{ - pagetable_pmd_dtor(page_ptdesc(page)); -} - /* * No scalability reason to split PUD locks yet, but follow the same pattern * as the PMD locks to make it easier if we decide to. The VM should not be -- 2.40.1