From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Arnd Bergmann" Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] arch/x86: Declare edid_info in Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: <80e3a583-805e-4e8f-a67b-ebe2e4b9a7e5@app.fastmail.com> References: <20230629121952.10559-1-tzimmermann@suse.de> <20230629121952.10559-8-tzimmermann@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=TQfJYKjFuTxBxFIcup163TdO5/H4oZgTTG6YYCHpg8U=; b=p307/ZaC1SZVHC s4fxG035xNOarHcA9cDoA+CYrViPBmZkhL/pVwJqjiSm5tHoE9w0H5L+55nKujyhh8ajYQJYa/XII DwaQ0ACP+dGYYkKGQpbmGR8qttKnCVlLts1Zk7z7Tah49SxnI29G9K8vNqa1pb662goPfKO3gszFP 91k8fEzVFqNBPSk2thEHgSdNsYUutKccqGG+A19kprzjuiKwPWZ0R0tYit2V2KVGFt3WjQtlcIuXs q63NHQVbezSNV2osPwgpRD0ssmlN6xH/R6pH+ctI+frz6z8xmVzSmkXnRlLIcPgVCFPjUvk9jZItI uWd07CWfson5wOFXRQNg==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1688042167; x=1688049367; bh=bT G+9AqapEnTzTdZN+3/z4mAZ7LW415XlukWbIMXEK4=; b=jVer3ZsYEpv4oKp9MB szsrrrdYGu7rGZrQTOVLMkGALoFHHLvc/oUUpXJBoXJgdCfT0l7aA0yKhATrYNXB aEGN9jvcC01pqiHdFsqq0bkFFSz9UIn0wpYtG5wYSyHBgIUb0q0WF10Dn3D0ys+Q XdVTz1xDdvBF5BWZT8QJkN/TJUgNTFQEn9uRiImRIIIxVlZAUYgfDYxAZN24C9If 0fvLO/7Vh+JJJx9ib3bnVyk06XlQdUmqqoWItzk2IhpGynOSTiS1PFOrwsJCeCaJ 8UiDOATEhC65kKFJEjC7rOkzppp5TX9XQuMvRoXskdiug/iaC/tnwPy1ygPdzaL6 IoZw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1688042167; x=1688049367; bh=bTG+9AqapEnTz TdZN+3/z4mAZ7LW415XlukWbIMXEK4=; b=CccPJWvx1a+Oz1MM5Taiu9fsGftW9 hmgBcLqXYChcnfp2nv6RWUg7M5kQcytbmDfhV1AVipcw49+CmNKous2ER6JLcGud qLKDK3EFXotIhbICdzx3r91mhkebGgUqVWBxeOtOqIwIjt2VLx2+7M0e0ZNBw8IY QYBew9HSxFvupkHfoU1p8ZntBi5WUvQWBmTXQhafzKFZRTGtPdZIsRBX2guG6EvC jm91VDAmWV04RD50eKeuNQ1gIbDXgSNCl/ADV15oAHykwZ0L0pLZZYK3u1cr3+Rr x7zXD2MAiXbufbU1CsLjDKzyEFWnoX4+00s21o08yDXbrmZmwqDH+dXBg== In-Reply-To: <20230629121952.10559-8-tzimmermann@suse.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+glpr-linux-riscv=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.infradead.org To: Thomas Zimmermann , Helge Deller , Daniel Vetter , Dave Airlie Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Linux-Arch , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Kees Cook , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra On Thu, Jun 29, 2023, at 13:45, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The global variable edid_info contains the firmware's EDID information > as an extension to the regular screen_info on x86. Therefore move it to > . > > Add the Kconfig token ARCH_HAS_EDID_INFO to guard against access on > architectures that don't provide edid_info. Select it on x86. I'm not sure we need another symbol in addition to CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID. Since all the code behind that existing symbol is also x86 specific, would it be enough to just add either 'depends on X86' or 'depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST' there? Arnd