linux-hexagon.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>, Tom Rix <tri>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] bitops: unify non-atomic bitops prototypes across architectures
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:09:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWB8CjbOarttKSaY2=kASbqU2UBCe9bpU17=MdZP_rGUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624121313.2382500-4-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 2:13 PM Alexander Lobakin
<alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
> Currently, there is a mess with the prototypes of the non-atomic
> bitops across the different architectures:
>
> ret     bool, int, unsigned long
> nr      int, long, unsigned int, unsigned long
> addr    volatile unsigned long *, volatile void *
>
> Thankfully, it doesn't provoke any bugs, but can sometimes make
> the compiler angry when it's not handy at all.
> Adjust all the prototypes to the following standard:
>
> ret     bool                            retval can be only 0 or 1
> nr      unsigned long                   native; signed makes no sense
> addr    volatile unsigned long *        bitmaps are arrays of ulongs
>
> Next, some architectures don't define 'arch_' versions as they don't
> support instrumentation, others do. To make sure there is always the
> same set of callables present and to ease any potential future
> changes, make them all follow the rule:
>  * architecture-specific files define only 'arch_' versions;
>  * non-prefixed versions can be defined only in asm-generic files;
> and place the non-prefixed definitions into a new file in
> asm-generic to be included by non-instrumented architectures.
>
> Finally, add some static assertions in order to prevent people from
> making a mess in this room again.
> I also used the %__always_inline attribute consistently, so that
> they always get resolved to the actual operations.
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

>  arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h                | 49 ++++++++++-----

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-06 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-24 12:13 [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] ia64, processor: fix -Wincompatible-pointer-types in ia64_get_irr() Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 16:14   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-01-02 16:30     ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-01-02 17:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] bitops: unify non-atomic bitops prototypes across architectures Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-06 10:09   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] bitops: define const_*() versions of the non-atomics Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] bitops: wrap non-atomic bitops with a transparent macro Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15  0:04   ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 13:26     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-15 13:49       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-07-15 14:19         ` Yury Norov
2022-07-15 14:50           ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] net/ice: fix initializing the bitmap in the switch code Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] bitmap: don't assume compiler evaluates small mem*() builtins calls Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] lib: test_bitmap: add compile-time optimization/evaluations assertions Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Borislav Petkov
2022-06-30 16:56 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-07-01  2:58   ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdWB8CjbOarttKSaY2=kASbqU2UBCe9bpU17=MdZP_rGUA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcain@quicinc.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).