linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Surekha.PC" <surekhap@cisco.com>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: inconsistent renaming of devices
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:29:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <007f01c3eca2$cf998df0$a0074d0a@apac.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-107165372413670@msgid-missing>


Hi all,

 The problem is no longer seen on. It seems like a setup problem, the
installed udev binary size was not matching with that of udev-016. This
could have happened when I installed udev-016 without uninstalling the
old package. The udev binary was not installed properly, so 'udevsend'
and 'udevd' were not started. This was causing problem in device
creation. I cleanly uninstalled the old package and installed udev-016,
now device addition/removal is happening fine.

Thanks much for your inputs.

regds,
surekha

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 5:22 AM
To: Surekha.PC
Cc: 'Martin Lorenz'; linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: inconsistent renaming of devices


On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 03:29:41PM +0530, Surekha.PC wrote:
> 
> 
> >What do you see happening in your system?
> >If you build with DEBUG=true USE_LOG=true what does the debug syslog
> show for these
> >devices?
> 
> It seems the user<->kernel race still persists.
> 
> During device addition randomly few device/partition entries are not 
> getting created. If debug is enabled all devices are created. With 
> debug turned off, only few of them are created. So in this case I am 
> not able to capture debug for devices not getting created.
> 
> Again device removal is also having the similar inconsistent 
> behaviour. Irrespective of debug being on/off few stale device entries

> are retained under /udev.
> 
> In this scenario I could see some debug messages as below.
> 
> Looks like the sysfs entries for the device are removed long before 
> udev lookup.

What kind of block device is this?  

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> -----------------
> udev_hotplug: looking at '/block/sdc'
> udev_hotplug: looking at '/block/sde/sde2
> udev_hotplug: looking at '/block/sde/sde3
> get_dirs: sysfs_path='/sys'
> udev_hotplug: don't care about 'scsi_device' devices
> .....
> namedev_init_rules: reading '/etc/udev/udev.rules' as rules file
> .....
> udev_hotplug: looking at '/block/sdc/sdc3
> udev_hotplug: don't care about 'scsi_device' devices
> udev_remove_device: name is 'iscsib0t38l0sd3'
> ......
> udev_remove_device: '/class/scsi_device/40:0:38:1' not found in
> database, falling back on default name
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> 
> In the above debug messages, I could observe the first few hotplug 
> events for device removal are not getting passed to 
> udev_remove_device(). This results in those device entries not getting

> removed.

How are we dropping events?  Are you using the udevsend/udevd/udev
situation, or just udev?  I don't see how we could drop events just
using udev alone.

> Let me know if you need more information from the debug log, I will 
> send it to you.

Please do.  Along with annotation of what is going on.

thanks,

greg k-h



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-06 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-17  9:33 inconsistent renaming of devices Martin Lorenz
2003-12-17 18:13 ` Greg KH
2004-02-05  6:40 ` Surekha.PC
2004-02-05  8:56 ` Greg KH
2004-02-05  9:56 ` Olaf Hering
2004-02-05 10:11 ` Surekha.PC
2004-02-05 23:49 ` Greg KH
2004-02-05 23:51 ` Greg KH
2004-02-06  0:18 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-06  6:34 ` Surekha.PC
2004-02-06  9:18 ` 'Kay Sievers'
2004-02-06 11:29 ` Surekha.PC [this message]
2004-02-08 14:13 ` Olaf Hering
2004-02-09  5:51 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2004-02-09  6:31 ` Olaf Hering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='007f01c3eca2$cf998df0$a0074d0a@apac.cisco.com' \
    --to=surekhap@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).