linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Zeuthen <david@fubar.dk>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: udev and dbus
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:31:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1078936268.1731.45.camel@powerbook.fubar.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040217214449.GB12411@wonderland.linux.it>


Hi Greg and Kay,

As far as I can tell there are still issues with the dbus support in
udev due to the fact that udev needs to be available in early boot -
this issue have been raised a few times with little or response. 

I'm willing to make a patch to fix it (unless someone beats me to it),
but before I go ahead I'd like some input on how we want it to look
like. I can see at least the following three scenarios:

 1. Remove dbus support from udev and make udev call /sbin/hotplug with
    a single positional parameter, 'udev', and the environment variables
    DEVPATH pointing to the appropriate directory in sysfs, ACTION
    assuming 'add' respectively 'remove' and DEVICE_FILE pointing to
    the created / removed special device file.

    This way, applications, like HAL, interested in the event can simply
    install a small program in /etc/hotplug.d/[udev,default] to do
    whatever they want with the event, like sending it to a daemon
    possibly through what may be the IPC-flavour of the month :-)

    (yes, this might be abusing the hotplug multiplexor)

 2. Move dbus support from udev to udevd, make sure udevd never
    exits, and let udevd own the org.kernel.udev service. I guess
    this would imply building two udevd binaries; one with
    dbus support and one without (for early boot) and make the small
    one load the big one upon receiving SIGUSR1. I think Marco
    d'Itri came up with this approach.

    I'm not too familiar with udevd, but I seem to recall that it
    spawns udev copies to do the work so it may require more tweaking
    to do this.

    However, using this approach, we can also offer queries on the
    udev database using dbus instead of using udevinfo. That would
    be nice.

 3. Remove dbus support and if applications are interested in sending
    out events using IPC like dbus, they just install a udev callout.

    I'm not sure this is easy today as all the callout rules are in
    a single file instead of a directory with rule files. I may be
    wrong on this though.

Of course, there might be other ways of acheiving sending out events
through e.g. dbus, but I can't think of any.

Let me know what you think - I'd really like to resolve this issue.

Take care,
David 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-10 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-17 21:44 udev and DBUS Marco d'Itri
2004-02-26 17:00 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-02-28 14:13 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-10 16:31 ` David Zeuthen [this message]
2004-03-10 17:52 ` udev and dbus Kay Sievers
2004-03-10 19:18 ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 19:56 ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 19:57 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-10 20:00 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-10 20:02 ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 22:25 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-03-10 22:37 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-10 22:48 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11  1:28 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11  2:35 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11  8:55 ` Martin Waitz
2004-03-11 14:30 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 15:06 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-11 17:14 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 17:23 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 17:30 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-11 17:41 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-11 17:44 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:12 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:22 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-11 18:32 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:35 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:36 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:37 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:38 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:40 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:47 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:56 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-12  0:18 ` Greg KH
2004-03-12 11:37 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-12 15:54 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-12 16:40 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-03-12 17:17 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-12 17:26 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-13 15:22 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-13 18:29 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-14 19:59 ` Olaf Hering
2004-03-14 20:06 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-14 20:11 ` Olaf Hering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1078936268.1731.45.camel@powerbook.fubar.dk \
    --to=david@fubar.dk \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).