linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Zeuthen <david@fubar.dk>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udev and dbus
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:41:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079026902.1571.86.camel@powerbook.fubar.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040217214449.GB12411@wonderland.linux.it>

On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 18:14, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 16:06, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 15:30, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > Sorry, but are you guys getting completely crazy? :)
> > > 
> > > Why you want a stacked hotplug.d/udev.d forking hell or a "serializer"
> > > for the dbus daemon? This is simply unmaintainable and _nobody_ will
> > > understand this. 
> > 
> > What's so difficult with understanding that udev calls a series of
> > programs in /etc/udev.d when it add/remove device nodes?
> 
> Oh, it's not as easy as you might think. Just read this list or
> _your_ yesterdays mail, where you propose that udev should call
> /sbin/hotplug, which is a nice loop, right :)
> 

Oh, come on - it's not like udev should create/remove device nodes on
getting a hotplug event with the single positional parameter being
'udev', right? That would be quite stupid.

I was merely suggesting to use an existing multiplexor mechanishm so
people only need to care about /etc/hotplug.d and not both
/etc/hotplug.d and /etc/udev.d.

> Just make udevsend wait until the nodes are created (we already have a
> patch for it from Chris) and execute udevsend as the first program with
> /sbin/hotplug. All the following programs are sure that the nodes on
> it's place and can query the node names with udevinfo. Easy, clean, nice
> transparent and understandable.
> 

Wearing a purist-hat, I would consider this a bad hack - so you want to
hardcode the requirement that udevinfo needs to run before anything into
whatever hotplug multiplexor is running? 

What if I want to write a hotplug multiplexor that runs a number of
programs in parallel in response to a hotplug event? What if I want to
write another implementation of a device node manager to replace udev? 
(not that I want to at, I really like udev, but I'm against setting
requirements on how a hotplug multiplexor should work).

> udev is a device node manager, nothing more. I _strongly_ disagree on
> making udev a arbitrary hotplug script engine. Please solve the problem
> on it's source not on the first comfortable place :)

No. I'm simply asking that udev executes a program when it add/removes
device nodes, that's all - calling this an arbritary hotplug script
engine is simply not representative of what I ask for. I've said I'm
even willing to write the patch myself :-)

Thanks,
David


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-11 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-17 21:44 udev and DBUS Marco d'Itri
2004-02-26 17:00 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-02-28 14:13 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-10 16:31 ` udev and dbus David Zeuthen
2004-03-10 17:52 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-10 19:18 ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 19:56 ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 19:57 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-10 20:00 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-10 20:02 ` Greg KH
2004-03-10 22:25 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-03-10 22:37 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-10 22:48 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11  1:28 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11  2:35 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11  8:55 ` Martin Waitz
2004-03-11 14:30 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 15:06 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-11 17:14 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 17:23 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 17:30 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-11 17:41 ` David Zeuthen [this message]
2004-03-11 17:44 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:12 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:22 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-11 18:32 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:35 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:36 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:37 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:38 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:40 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-11 18:47 ` Greg KH
2004-03-11 18:56 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-12  0:18 ` Greg KH
2004-03-12 11:37 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-12 15:54 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-12 16:40 ` Daniel Stekloff
2004-03-12 17:17 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-12 17:26 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-03-13 15:22 ` David Zeuthen
2004-03-13 18:29 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-14 19:59 ` Olaf Hering
2004-03-14 20:06 ` Kay Sievers
2004-03-14 20:11 ` Olaf Hering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1079026902.1571.86.camel@powerbook.fubar.dk \
    --to=david@fubar.dk \
    --cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).