From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 03:21:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [Lhns-devel] Re: Who's doing what with cpu/memory/node hotplug? Message-Id: <1084504890.8564.229.camel@nighthawk> List-Id: References: <20040513150842.22F5.YGOTO@us.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20040513150842.22F5.YGOTO@us.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 20:02, Keiichiro Tokunaga wrote: > On Thu, 13 May 2004 18:28:37 -0700 > Dave Hansen wrote: > > I don't see any real reasons why we can't make I/O only nodes. I know > > that we've run into and fixed a few situations where a node came up with > > either no cpus or no memory for various reasons before. Does anybody > > have any philosophical objections to having I/O only nodes? > > I'm afraid I didn't know that the issue had discussed. I just > wondered if it's possible or not. It was more like a question > and I don't have any objection to having I/O only nodes. Can > you direct me to the discussion so that I could follow you :)? It's just a vague impression that the topic seems familliar. I'd say: if no one speaks too stronly about the whole topic, consider it an OK. :) -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id%62&alloc_ida84&op=click _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel