From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:55:05 +0000 Subject: Re: initramfs: udev, hotplug, klibc and modprobe Message-Id: <1105620905.9061.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <1105307950.9630.49.camel@juerg-p4.bitron.ch> In-Reply-To: <1105307950.9630.49.camel@juerg-p4.bitron.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 08:50 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Kay Sievers wrote: >=20 > > Maybe udevd should be started from initramfs and never be replaced by a > > different one? We may just add a knob to the "real" udevd to hold the > > event execution back until userspace asks to flush the queue and udevd > > switches over to the current behavior. >=20 > At the first glance, that's a good idea.=20 Yes, sounds promising. Let's see what J=C3=BCrg thinks, it's is very close = to his setup, maybe he can try it out... > One drawback: one has to write the plain-text INSTALL file This is not too hard, I think. :) > and also think of the users who don't want udev and > prefer static /dev instead. Sure, but it doesn't make a lot of sense to think about what we can do _with_ udev for people who don't want udev, right? :) Thanks, Kay ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel