From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:20:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH, UDEV] fix permission inconsistency in relation to Message-Id: <1107616852.5494.97.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <200502051426.14173.mbuesch@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <200502051426.14173.mbuesch@freenet.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 16:09 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > Quoting Kay Sievers : > > On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 15:33 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > On Feb 05, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > > > > > Should we change that now, so that permissions are applied from a > > > > symlink-only rule too? > > > Yes! > > > I think it's the sensible semantic: the second rule adds a new SYMLINK > > > *and* sets the permissions of the node, which are two distinct > > > operations applied by the same rule. > > > > Yeah, we should do that now. > > > > > Unless you think it's broken, I will add the patch to the debian package > > > of 051 (almost ready). > > > > I think we can make it even simpler, by applying the permission > > unconditionally, right? > > Yes, seems correct. > A first test showed that this works. I've applied it to my tree, thanks. > PS: Please CC: me on this topic, as I'm not subscribed to the mailing list. > Thanks. Sorry, you slipped it the To:. Didn't you get message directly? Thanks, Kay ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel