From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott James Remnant Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:35:52 +0000 Subject: Re: default udev rules Message-Id: <1218468952.14932.16.camel@quest> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-VTmO4Y/JHwuyp85anHhT" List-Id: References: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> In-Reply-To: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --=-VTmO4Y/JHwuyp85anHhT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 17:28 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 16:20 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 16:54 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > >=20 > > > That just wrong to do, and I can not see how you could solve the upda= te > > > problem that way. > > >=20 > > What update problem? > >=20 > > As far as I'm aware, we've never had one. >=20 > We've seen several cases, maybe it's just the mentioned "beauty", that > makes you the lucky one. :) >=20 I don't recall mentioning any beauty? Scott --=20 Scott James Remnant scott@canonical.com --=-VTmO4Y/JHwuyp85anHhT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIoFxYSnQiFMl4yK4RAgswAKCltrTmzqAeMPsa0Lccc2mp3SPFegCePBlD t0+qpcmN2WvzeeyRRS9eGFo= =vK7i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VTmO4Y/JHwuyp85anHhT--