From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kay Sievers Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:50:01 +0000 Subject: Re: default udev rules Message-Id: <1218469801.4448.83.camel@lgn.site> List-Id: References: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> In-Reply-To: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 16:36 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > We have concerns, and you're telling us that they are petty. I didn't do, sorry if you could understand it like this. Earlier in this thread, Marco wrote: " Not going to happen, because: - I consider my rules much more readable and elegant than yours" > You're also telling us that *we* have to do the work to use your > rules, and have the fight with you to get your rules changed where > we need to. I just _asked_ for getting a set of rules we all use, nothing else. You wrote: "The conflation of names and permissions in the default rules is a problem for us", so why shouldn't I ask for the actual things that cause problems? Thanks, Kay