From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott James Remnant Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:10:02 +0000 Subject: Re: default udev rules Message-Id: <1218474602.14932.45.camel@quest> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-QoahVh7aqYnyEtvywRGs" List-Id: References: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> In-Reply-To: <1218277281.31266.32.camel@lgn.site> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --=-QoahVh7aqYnyEtvywRGs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 18:45 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 11, Kay Sievers wrote: >=20 > > There is not really a need for a compromise, we asked you to send a > > patch to add that "elegance", and we will change the default rules > Tell me what's missing from my rules instead, I will fix it and then you > will be able to use them. If nothing is missing, then you can replace > the files right now. >=20 > BTW: *I* documented the semantics of the Debian rules files. From > README.Debian: >=20 This is different from Ubuntu's? 00 rules that it is critical to be run first, usually only WAIT_FOR_SYSFS 20 rules that change the name from the device from the default (cannot be overriden) 40 rules that set the permissions of device nodes (can be overriden by later rules) 60 rules that add symlinks to device nodes (adds to those set in earlier rules) 80 rules that run programs (but do not load modules) 90 rules that load modules 99 rules that it is critical to be run last Scott --=20 Scott James Remnant scott@canonical.com --=-QoahVh7aqYnyEtvywRGs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIoHJqSnQiFMl4yK4RAimjAKCZFADkCNaa4xWfSPAmRxPPHWizvACffkru z7F7asAdQJLwBYQoG1Nh84c= =EKSf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QoahVh7aqYnyEtvywRGs--