From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott James Remnant Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:11:15 +0000 Subject: Re: Report: Threaded udevd Message-Id: <1224695475.7588.12.camel@quest> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-87TLR0+3jmRcgXuBx7JB" List-Id: References: <48FF3458.6030909@tuffmail.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <48FF3458.6030909@tuffmail.co.uk> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --=-87TLR0+3jmRcgXuBx7JB Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 19:02 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 22, Greg KH wrote: >=20 > > > > I see no problem with depending on the very latest kernels; using a > > > > latest udev version goes hand-in-hand with using a latest kernel. > > > I do, since this tends to badly mess upgrades... > > How? Can't you just specify a minimum kernel version in your packaging > > system for the latest version of udev? That's what we do for other > > distros... > The problem is handling upgrades between two different major revisions >=20 We just don't restart the kernel or udev until after the upgrade is done :) Scott --=20 Scott James Remnant scott@canonical.com --=-87TLR0+3jmRcgXuBx7JB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkj/XrMACgkQSnQiFMl4yK5N/wCcDq/qJlk4r0sJmGymdfQoj4Uj NfQAnj3qQ0olj1qDeeqqf7I+79CQfZIp =6EkP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-87TLR0+3jmRcgXuBx7JB--