From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott James Remnant Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:18:03 +0000 Subject: Re: udev lvm permisions Message-Id: <1229361483.21463.14.camel@quest> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-L1QnDTI74zI5hw//OEeC" List-Id: References: <1229336451.19633.4.camel@linux-pqqd.site> In-Reply-To: <1229336451.19633.4.camel@linux-pqqd.site> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --=-L1QnDTI74zI5hw//OEeC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 18:14 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Yep, and they are racy, we discussed that at the time you did that. It > seems to work fine for you though, which is good. But I didn't want to > add that any enterprise release, which we would need to support for > many years. Device-mapper needs _proper_ udev integration, not a > "overwrite each-other and the last one wins" solution. :) >=20 I don't agree that there's any race here. I agree that there's a better long-term solution, but when there are bug fixes that work, I prefer not to leave the bug open for N years. (And I have more than enough things on my own todo list to work on other people's :p) Scott --=20 Scott James Remnant scott@canonical.com --=-L1QnDTI74zI5hw//OEeC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklGkUsACgkQSnQiFMl4yK6CbQCfdkORy9Ek87gtY+aG20kArlhr w1wAn2cB/VoaAg3Y3h9/QQH8xnCFqMCK =e9t/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-L1QnDTI74zI5hw//OEeC--