From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explicitly disable BT radio using rfkill interface on
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:49:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246488560.12994.179.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4A8B6D.3060509@dell.com>
Hi Mario,
> > I'm really still not quite clear on what the issue here is. At boot,
> > there are hid devices that need to be quirked into hci mode. Over
> > suspend these devices return to their original state. So something needs
> > to be done to quirk them back on resume. Why is this a kernel issue at
> > all?
> >
> >
> At boot, the top level device exposes two virtual HID devices. A
> userspace utility prods one of the HID devices and then the top level
> device exposes an HCI device. Upon S3/resume, a reset-resume happens,
> and the HCI device is gone. The system thinks that they are in the same
> state after S3 (with the exception of the missing HCI device) so a UDEV
> ADD or CHANGE event doesn't happen.
if this is about the uevent issue again, then RFKILL is not the solution
for it. This should be fixed completely in userspace.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-30 22:02 [PATCH] Explicitly disable BT radio using rfkill interface on Mario Limonciello
2009-06-30 22:26 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-01 3:53 ` [PATCH] Explicitly disable BT radio using rfkill interface on suspend Mario_Limonciello
2009-07-01 12:06 ` [PATCH] Explicitly disable BT radio using rfkill interface on Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-01 13:13 ` [PATCH] Explicitly disable BT radio using rfkill interface on suspend Mario_Limonciello
2009-07-01 15:03 ` [PATCH] Explicitly disable BT radio using rfkill interface on Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-01 17:12 ` Mario Limonciello
2009-07-01 17:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-07-01 22:13 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-01 22:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-07-01 22:23 ` Mario Limonciello
2009-07-01 22:49 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2009-07-01 22:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-07-02 14:02 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-10 14:46 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-14 16:40 ` Mario Limonciello
2009-07-14 16:51 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-14 16:52 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-14 17:32 ` Mario Limonciello
2009-07-14 18:46 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-14 19:12 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-14 21:00 ` Mario Limonciello
2009-07-14 21:20 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-07-14 21:24 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-14 22:45 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-15 2:07 ` Alan Stern
2009-07-15 2:26 ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-15 22:15 ` Mario Limonciello
2009-07-15 22:24 ` Mario Limonciello
2009-07-15 23:27 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246488560.12994.179.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).