From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:17:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] tracing, perf : add cpu hotplug trace events Message-Id: <1298582255.5226.843.camel@laptop> List-Id: References: <1298573197.2428.457.camel@twins> <20110224201124.138311ba@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <1298579452.5226.834.camel@laptop> <20110224210431.7a6bba68@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Alan Cox , Nicolas Pitre , Vincent Guittot , lkml , linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , amit.kucheria@linaro.org, Rusty Russell , Ingo Molnar On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 22:12 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > If you take down the whole SoC, then it's full S2RAM or some > equivilant thing. That's a different story and propably requires the > whole hotplug muck. Didn't we, during the whole wakelock trainwreck, that s2ram could be done from idle as well (for hardware where the whole opportunistic suspend was sensible to begin with)?