From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jon Ringle <jon@ringle.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:32:37 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use utime rather than utimes
Message-Id: <152584231003100732l2454cfdcn3b804c5425d39294@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1268195770-20935-1-git-send-email-jon@ringle.org>
In-Reply-To: <1268195770-20935-1-git-send-email-jon@ringle.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org

I'm not subscribed to the list, but saw the discussion in the archive.
I tested your patch here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/hotplug/msg03470.html
And it builds successfully with uclibc

Jon

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:36, Jon Ringle <jon@ringle.org> wrote:
>> uclibc does not have lutimes and legacy function utimes should be replac=
ed
>> with utime
>
> utime(): POSIX.1-2008 marks utime() as obsolete. I guess uclibc needs
> to be fixed if it is supposed to compile udev.
>
>> - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 lutimes(slink, NULL);
>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 utime(target, NULL);
>
> We do not care about the target, also utime() follows links which is
> why we can't use it.
>
> Kay
>