linux-hotplug.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* planed final version number?
@ 2003-12-31 12:40 udev
  2003-12-31 19:27 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: udev @ 2003-12-31 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-hotplug

What is the planed final version number?

When udev was 0.1 then I would expect that 1.0 will be the final (100%
working) version.

But now the current version is 011, does this mean that the 100% working
version will be numbered 999 or 1000? :-)

I tried udev 010 and it seems to me that _a lot of_ devices are _not_
created by udev. I don't remember which ones, but I think it was ps/2 mouse
(/dev/psaux) or serial modem (/dev/ttyS0) or something like this. Will this
change in future releases?


Tomas



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1278&alloc_id371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: planed final version number?
  2003-12-31 12:40 planed final version number? udev
@ 2003-12-31 19:27 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2003-12-31 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-hotplug

On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:40:23PM +0100, udev@linux-live.org wrote:
> What is the planed final version number?

What is the planned final version number of Linux?  :)

> When udev was 0.1 then I would expect that 1.0 will be the final (100%
> working) version.

Heh, 0.1 was a fully working version.

> But now the current version is 011, does this mean that the 100% working
> version will be numbered 999 or 1000? :-)

Who knows.  Who is one to say, "This is it"?  I changed the numbering
scheme because numbers really mean nothing more than a way to differ
different versions of the program over time.

> I tried udev 010 and it seems to me that _a lot of_ devices are _not_
> created by udev. I don't remember which ones, but I think it was ps/2 mouse
> (/dev/psaux) or serial modem (/dev/ttyS0) or something like this. Will this
> change in future releases?

That's not a udev issue, it's a kernel issue.  There are some patches in
the -mm kernel tree that provide sysfs support for misc devices (like
psaux), enabling udev to create those device nodes.

ttyS0 should work just fine with a 2.6.0 kernel, please let me know if
that is not true.

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1278&alloc_id371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-31 19:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-31 12:40 planed final version number? udev
2003-12-31 19:27 ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).