From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:54:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev - advanced user query options Message-Id: <20040116215400.GA2953@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <20040111023300.GA4762@vrfy.org> In-Reply-To: <20040111023300.GA4762@vrfy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:49:05AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:16:05PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > > > > > Is there any plus value to have a second index? > > > > It's a speed vs. database size trade off. I think we can handle the > > speed hit :) > > If it adds too much code, make it an external tool. I think there is not > much point to add all and everything to the udev binary. Maybe something > like kinit, which links libipconfig.a and libnfsmount.a. I agree. I envision that when udev splits up into a daemon and sending program, it will also spin off a "query the database" program to handle this. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel