From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: about split the udev
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 01:08:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040122010830.GA32256@vrfy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8402D4EE96@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 01:27:45AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:38:25PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:45:10PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:36:25PM +0800, Ling, Xiaofeng wrote:
> > > > Hi, Greg
> > > > I wrote a simple implementation for the two pieces
> > > > of send and receive hotplug event,
> > > > use a message queue and a list for the out of order
> > > > hotplug event. It also has a timeout timer of 3 seconds.
> > > > They are now separate program. the file nseq is the test script.
> > > > Could you have a look to see wether it is feasible?
> > > > If so, I'll continue to merge with udev.
> > >
> > > Yes, very nice start. Please continue on.
> > >
> > > One minor comment, please stick with the kernel coding style when you
> > > are writing new code for udev.
> >
> > I took the code from Xiaofeng, cleaned the whitespace, renamed some bits,
> > tweaked the debugging, added the udev exec and created a patch for the current tree.
> >
> > It seems functional now, by simply executing our current udev (dirty hack).
> > It reorders the incoming events and if one is missing it delays the
> > execution of the following ones up to a maximum of 10 seconds.
> >
> > Test script is included, but you can't mix hotplug sequence numbers and
> > test script numbers, it will result in waiting for the missing numbers :)
>
> Hey, nobody want's to play with me?
> So here I'm chatting with myself :)
>
> This is the next version with signal handling for resetting the expected
> signal number. I changed the behaviour of the timeout to skip all
> missing events at once and to proceed with the next event in the queue.
>
> So it's now possible to use the test script at any time, cause it resets
> the daemon, if real hotplug event coming in later all missing nimbers will
> be skipped after a timeout of 10 seconds and the queued events are applied.
Here for the lazy one :)
Log from the test script which demonstrates the event reordering.
Event 5 is arriving before event 4, so 4 is queued until 5 is coming in,
then both are executed.
Events 8 and 9 are completely missing, so we wait for 10 seconds then go
ahead and exec the remaining events in the queue.
thanks,
Kay
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 0
#in 1
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 1, expected sequence 0
#out 1
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 1, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 2
#in 2
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 2, expected sequence 2
#out 2
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 2, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 3
#in 3
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 3, expected sequence 3
#out 3
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 3, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 4
#in 5
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 5, expected sequence 4
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 4
#queue 5
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 5
#in 4
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 4, expected sequence 4
#out 4
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 4, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 5
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 5 out queued 5
#out 5 (delayed)
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 5, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
#in 6
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 6, expected sequence 6
#out 6
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 6, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 7
#in 7
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 7, expected sequence 7
#out 7
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 7, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 8
#in 10
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 10, expected sequence 8
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 8 queue 10
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 10
#in 11
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 11, expected sequence 8
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 8 queue 11
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 10
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 11
#in 12
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 12, expected sequence 8
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 8 queue 12
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 10
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 11
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 12
#in 13
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: current sequence 13, expected sequence 8
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 8 queue 13
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 10
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 11
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 12
Jan 22 01:16:42 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 13
#10 seconds timeout, skip missing events 8 and 9, proceed with queue
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: sig_alarmhandler: caught signal 14
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: sig_alarmhandler: timeout, event lost
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: process_queue: timeout reached, skip events 8 - 9
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: next expected sequence 10
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 10
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 11
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 12
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_queue: queued sequence 13
#out 10 (delayed)
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 10, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
#out 11 (delayed)
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 11, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
#out 12 (delayed)
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 12, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
#out 13 (delayed)
Jan 22 01:16:52 pim udev[17562]: dump_msg: sequence 13, 'add', '/block/sda', 'block'
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-22 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-12 7:53 about split the udev Ling, Xiaofeng
2004-01-12 9:36 ` Martin Waitz
2004-01-12 13:54 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-12 16:23 ` Martin Waitz
2004-01-12 16:28 ` Robert Love
2004-01-12 17:51 ` David Zeuthen
2004-01-13 1:12 ` Greg KH
2004-01-13 1:29 ` Greg KH
2004-01-13 19:05 ` Tristan Wibberley
2004-01-13 20:36 ` Greg KH
2004-01-15 14:36 ` Ling, Xiaofeng
2004-01-15 21:45 ` Greg KH
2004-01-21 13:38 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-22 0:27 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-22 1:08 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2004-01-22 23:01 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-23 0:34 ` Greg KH
2004-01-23 1:00 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-23 3:37 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-23 3:46 ` Greg KH
2004-01-23 3:58 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-23 4:04 ` Greg KH
2004-01-24 16:06 ` Ling, Xiaofeng
2004-01-24 16:57 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040122010830.GA32256@vrfy.org \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).