From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] udevd - cleanup and better timeout handling
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:08:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040127190809.GA13461@vrfy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040125200314.GA8376@vrfy.org>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:28:19AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:11:10PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:22:34AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 09:03:14PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > > > 1. We are much too slow.
> > > > > We want to exec the real udev in the background, but a 'remove'
> > > > > is much much faster than a 'add', so we have a problem.
> > > > > Question: is it neccessary to order events for different devpath's?
> > > > > If no, we may wait_pid() for the exec only if we have another udev
> > > > > working on the same devpath.
> > > >
> > > > But how will we keep track of that? It's probably easier just to wait
> > > > for each one to finish, right?
> > >
> > > We leave the message in the queue until we reach the SIGCHLD for this
> > > pid. So we can search the queue if we are already working on this devpath,
> > > and delay the new exec until the former exec comes back.
> >
> > Ok, if that isn't too much trouble.
> >
> > > Is it feasible to run in parallel for different paths, or can you think
> > > of any problem?
> >
> > I can't think of any problem with that.
>
> Here is the next round. We have three queues now. All incoming messages
> are queued in msg_list and if nothing is missing we move it to the
> running_list and exec in the background.
> If the exec comes back, it removes the message from the running_list and
> frees the message.
>
> Before we exec, we check the running_list if there is a udev running on
> the same device path. If yes, we move the message to the delay_list. If
> the former exec comes back, we move the message to the running_list and
> exec it.
Oh, sorry forget about it now.
I will come up with something better tested.
Kay
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-27 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-25 20:03 [patch] udevd - cleanup and better timeout handling Kay Sievers
2004-01-26 18:22 ` Greg KH
2004-01-26 19:11 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-26 19:28 ` Greg KH
2004-01-26 19:42 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-26 22:26 ` Greg KH
2004-01-26 22:56 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-27 6:56 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-27 18:55 ` Greg KH
2004-01-27 19:08 ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2004-01-27 19:13 ` Greg KH
2004-01-28 21:47 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-29 1:52 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-29 1:56 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-29 15:55 ` Kay Sievers
2004-01-31 2:42 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-01 9:08 ` Greg KH
2004-02-01 18:16 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-02 2:19 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-02 8:21 ` Greg KH
2004-02-02 11:50 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-02 18:45 ` Greg KH
2004-02-02 21:36 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-03 1:26 ` Greg KH
2004-02-03 6:43 ` Ling, Xiaofeng
2004-02-03 20:12 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-04 0:56 ` Greg KH
2004-02-08 9:43 ` Olaf Hering
2004-02-08 15:22 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-08 15:40 ` Olaf Hering
2004-02-08 15:57 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-08 16:09 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040127190809.GA13461@vrfy.org \
--to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).