From: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@ums.usu.ru>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: udev + modprobe.conf
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:20:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200402231720.50908.patrakov@ums.usu.ru> (raw)
Hello,
I have my /dev on tmpfs managed by udev-018 (I use an initrd to mount that
tmpfs and populate it before the real init starts). It works, but there are
questions.
1) I put the following two lines into udev.rules instead of the default cdrom
rule:
BUS="ide", KERNEL="*[!0-9]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/model",
RESULT="PHILIPS CDD5301", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrw"
BUS="ide", KERNEL="*[!0-9]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/model",
RESULT="SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-148F", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom"
(sorry, they wrapped). Currently, the Philips drive is /dev/hdd and Samsung
is /dev/hdb. The symlinks work as expected, but I also want to have
a /dev/dvd symlink pointing to the Philips drive, in addition to the
existing /dev/cdrw symlink pointing to it. How can I do that?
2) udev works perfectly for devices that have some detectable hardware
corresponding to them, e.g. for PCI soundcards, agpgart, and so on. The
hotplug script detects the hardware at boot time, loads the module, and then
udev creates the device in /dev, so that this piece of hardware becomes
accessible.
But there are some modules that correspond not to real detectable hardware,
but to some abstract entities, e.g. "ppp_generic" and "loop". I know that the
FAQ says
Such a functionality isn't needed on a properly configured system. All
devices present on the system should generate hotplug events, loading
the appropriate driver, and udev will notice and create the
appropriate device node. If you don't want to keep all drivers for your
hardware in memory, then use something else to manage your modules
(scripts, modules.conf, etc.) This is not a task for udev.
The point is that the answer is probably incorrect. This is probably not the
task of udev, but this is not solvable with modules.conf. Let's review two
situations corresponding to older methods of managing /dev and loading
modules, using the "loop" module as an example.
a) Static /dev. The "mount" program tries to open /dev/loop0 (it exists, has
the major number 7 and the minor number 0). The kernel sees that this /dev
entry has no driver associated with it and tries to modprobe "char-major-7".
And this is handled using modprobe.conf.
b) devfs. The "mount" program tries to open /dev/loop0 (it does not exist).
Since devfs is very special, the kernel notifies devfsd about that. devfsd
tries to probe the module named "loop".
The end result in both cases is that the "loop" module gets loaded, the "open"
syscall succeeds, and the chicken-and-egg problem gets solved. This is not
the case for udev. Yes, I know that the FAQ says
The devfs approach caused a lot of spurious modprobe attempts as
programs probed to see if devices were present or not. Every probe
attempt created a process to run modprobe, almost all of which were
spurious.
Do I understand correctly that the "char-major-..." business deserves the same
attitude? If it does, please state it in the FAQ and remove the reference to
modprobe.conf from the previous answer. Also, doesn't this behaviour happen
with static bloated /dev directories of distros when a program tries to
figure out how many soundcards are installed?
If I am wrong, please point me to a correct way of loading the "loop" module.
If the answer is "preload it and all other non-detectable modules at boot
time with modprobe -a -t '*'", then my viewpoint is that we are returning
back to non-moduar Linux-1.2.x this way. So please suggest something
different.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1356&alloc_id438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-23 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-23 12:20 Alexander E. Patrakov [this message]
2004-02-23 15:01 ` udev + modprobe.conf Daniel Drake
2004-02-23 16:23 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-02-24 12:12 ` Marco d'Itri
2004-02-28 0:24 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200402231720.50908.patrakov@ums.usu.ru \
--to=patrakov@ums.usu.ru \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).