From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Marco d'Itri" Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:26:24 +0000 Subject: Re: udev and dbus Message-Id: <20040312172624.GB9805@wonderland.linux.it> List-Id: References: <20040217214449.GB12411@wonderland.linux.it> In-Reply-To: <20040217214449.GB12411@wonderland.linux.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Mar 11, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:55:54AM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote: > > hi :) > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:28:05PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > Why "/usr/sbin/udev" first? According to the LSB, everything in > > > /sbin/ is needed for boot, not /usr/sbin, right? > > > > then it will execute the big version if it is available and > > will use the small boot-only from /sbin otherwise. > > But again, why? What about my /etc/udev.d/ proposal instead? What else is supposed to use it? It looks a bit overdesigned to me. Other applications can listen to the HAL message to know when the device node has been created. I proposed that I make a patch to try both /usr/sbin/udev and /sbin/udev, try it in the debian package and see what happens. -- ciao, | Marco | [5044 mekCNRvCg3M.g] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel