From: Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@lnxi.com>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Non-hardware devices like loop: another idea
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 01:47:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040316184737.B14721@lnxi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403122003.00557.patrakov@ums.usu.ru>
What if you configure this options into the kernel, e.g.:
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y
CONFIG_TUN=y
... etc ...
rather than building all non-hardware backed devices as modules? Relying
on them being modules seems quite restrictive.
Mike
On Fri, Mar 12 2004 at 08:03,
Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@ums.usu.ru> wrote:
> Recently I stated that I am working on solution to the "chicken-and-egg"
> problem related to devices like /dev/loop*, /dev/nbd*, /dev/ppp and so on,
> which require no hardware and therefore are not detectable by the hotplug
> scripts.
>
> My (bad) idea was to include the sysfs entries that would appear after loading
> the module in the module itself by means of the MODULE_INFO macro, and then
> modify depmod to populate /lib/modules/<version>/sys and use it to
> populate /dev with the corresponding entries (the UDEV_TEST environment
> variable already allows us to override the location of the sysfs directory).
> Then the char-major magic will load these modules on demand.
>
> I have a proof-of-concept implementation (will mail it here if there is any
> demand). The list of files altered:
>
> module-init-tools-3.0-pre5/depmod.c
> linux-2.6.4/include/linux/module.h
> linux-2.6.4/drivers/block/loop.c
> linux-2.6.4/drivers/char/rtc.c
> linux-2.6.4/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
> ...and my udev initscript
>
> This is not a real, but a proof-of-concept implementation because there are
> much more such non-hardware modules. This works,
>
> --- BUT! ---
>
> I found my implementation rather clumsy and while implementing it I decided
> that it would be better to just mark such modules and modprobe tham all, and
> make the hotplug script modprobe other stuff. I decided to start implementing
> such mark... and found that it has already been done, so actually no patches
> are needed except for the udev initscript!
>
> I am talking about /lib/modules/<version>/modules.alias.
>
> The simple idea is to grep this file (and probably /etc/modprobe.conf also)
> for lines containing char-major and block-major. The list pretty much
> coincides with the list of non-hardware-related modules that nevertheless
> provide devices.
>
> Does anyone care to include this into the future release of udev?
>
> --
> Alexander E. Patrakov
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
> Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-17 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-12 15:03 Non-hardware devices like loop: another idea Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-17 1:47 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2004-03-17 4:13 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-17 4:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2004-03-17 6:39 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-17 17:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2004-03-18 3:56 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-18 4:24 ` Greg KH
2004-03-18 4:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2004-03-18 9:55 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-18 9:58 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-03-18 10:23 ` Marco d'Itri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040316184737.B14721@lnxi.com \
--to=msnitzer@lnxi.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).