From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:43:13 +0000 Subject: Re: some udev code coverage results Message-Id: <20040427164313.GA22293@kroah.com> List-Id: References: <1083019150.26612.148.camel@ibm-d.pdx.osdl.net> In-Reply-To: <1083019150.26612.148.camel@ibm-d.pdx.osdl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:34:16AM -0700, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I do not have a test suite for the whole udev project and thus have no > results to compare with yours :( I was only reporting on the results of > the tests provided by udev. I have rerun gcov for udev for all the udev > tests including udev/test/udevd/udevd-test.pl and enclosed the results > below (link also provided). Greg, would you be interested in patches to > expand/add some udev tests to hit the untouched portions of code or are > you satisfied with the current coverage provided by udev/test/? Code coverage reports by themselves don't really mean anything. But if you have real, useful tests that exercise the functionality of the code, instead of just trying for complete coverage, that's useful. So yes, I'm always interested in adding more tests to the test script to try to exercise more functions in udev, mainly to make sure we don't break anything in the future, and to validate that everything works today (much like your last patches did.) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg297 _______________________________________________ Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel