Re: udev zombies

[Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>]

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:45:31PM -0500, jnf wrote:
> looking through udevd.c right now at the signal handling routines, I see 
> that sig_handler is the routine called by all of the custom signal 
> handlers and it is just a switch statement and tests for SIGINT, SIGTERM 
> SIGALRM and SIGCHLD, so in theory [obviously nothing works as it should in 
> theory], we should never see the default statement, which is what we are 
> seeing- I havent had much of a chance to look at it, but i noticied this 
> line:
> act.sa_andler = sig_handler;
> 
> is that a typo, or is there something I'm not understanding? Shouldn't 
> that be act.sa_handler? I just changed the dbg() statement from unhandled 
> signal to dbg("unhandled signal number #\n", signum);, so im going to 
> reboot in a moment and then try to cause it to recieve the signal, also 
> its my gf's birthday so I won't have much more time tonight to play.

Come on, how can you compile this? I can't find this "typo" in the code.

thanks,
Kay


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel